Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31766202›Full record

ArticleVaccines2019

A PBMC-Based System to Assess Human T Cell Responses to Influenza Vaccine Candidates In Vitro.

Gabriela Tapia-Calle, Philip A Born, Georgia Koutsoumpli, Martin Ignacio Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Wouter L J Hinrichs, Anke L W Huckriede

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Viral vector-based therapeutic HPV vaccines.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Comparison of media for a human peripheral blood mononuclear cell-basedClinical and experimental vaccine research · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriela Tapia-CalleDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, 9713AV Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9509-7412
Philip A BornDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, 9713AV Groningen, The Netherlands.
Georgia KoutsoumpliDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, 9713AV Groningen, The Netherlands.
Martin Ignacio Gonzalez-RodriguezDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, 9713AV Groningen, The Netherlands.
Wouter L J HinrichsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, 9713AV Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anke L W HuckriedeDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, 9713AV Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2646-5143
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

European Union Seventh Framework Program 19 (FP7/2007-2013) Universal Influenza Vaccines Secured (UNISEC) 602012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine development is an expensive and time-consuming process that heavily relies on animal models. Yet, vaccine candidates that have previously succeeded in animal experiments often fail in clinical trials questioning the predictive value of animal models. Alternative assay systems that can add to the screening and evaluation of functional characteristics of vaccines in a human context before embarking on costly clinical trials are therefore urgently needed. In this study, we have established an in vitro system consisting of long-term cultures of unfractionated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy volunteers to assess (recall) T cell responses to vaccine candidates. We observed that different types of influenza vaccines (whole inactivated virus (WIV), split, and peptide vaccines) were all able to stimulate CD4 and CD8 T cell responses but to different extents in line with their reported in vivo properties. In-depth analyses of different T cell subsets revealed that the tested vaccines evoked mainly recall responses as indicated by the fact that the vast majority of the responding T cells had a memory phenotype. Furthermore, we observed vaccine-induced activation of T follicular helper cells, which are associated with the induction of humoral immune responses. Our results demonstrate the suitability of the established PBMC-based system for the in vitro evaluation of memory T cell responses to vaccines and the comparison of vaccine candidates in a human immune cell context. As such, it can help to bridge the gap between animal experiments and clinical trials and assist in the selection of promising vaccine candidates, at least for recall antigens.

Indexed as

influenzain vitropeptidessplitT cellsT follicular helper cellsvaccinesWIV

Identifiers

PMID31766202
PMCPMC6963913
OpenAlexW2987419287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.