Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31766126›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Early Intervention for Children at High Risk of Developmental Disability in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Narrative Review.

Maya Kohli-Lynch, Cally J Tann, Matthew E Ellis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Preventive early intervention strategies for neurodevelopmental disorders of high-risk infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maya Kohli-LynchCentre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol, 1-5 Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 1NU, UK.
Cally J TannMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health, Department of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Matthew E EllisCentre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol, 1-5 Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 1NU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7730-311X
University of Bristol · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/S004971/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), while neonatal mortality has fallen, the number of children under five with developmental disability remains unchanged. The first thousand days are a critical window for brain development, when interventions are particularly effective. Early Childhood Interventions (ECI) are supported by scientific, human rights, human capital and programmatic rationales. In high-income countries, it is recommended that ECI for high-risk infants start in the neonatal period, and specialised interventions for children with developmental disabilities as early as three months of age; more data is needed on the timing of ECI in LMICs. Emerging evidence supports community-based ECI which focus on peer support, responsive caregiving and preventing secondary morbidities. A combination of individual home visits and community-based groups are likely the best strategy for the delivery of ECI, but more evidence is needed to form strong recommendations, particularly on the dosage of interventions. More data on content, impact and implementation of ECI in LMICs for high-risk infants are urgently needed. The development of ECI for high-risk groups will build on universal early child development best practice but will likely require tailoring to local contexts.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolDeveloping CountriesDevelopmental DisabilitiesEarly Intervention, EducationalFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePovertyRisk Factorsdevelopmental disabilityearly childhood interventionlow- and middle-income countriesnewborn

Identifiers

PMID31766126
PMCPMC6888619
OpenAlexW2985915893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.