Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31765988›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2020

Dual Erb B Inhibition in Oesophago-gastric Cancer (DEBIOC): A phase I dose escalating safety study and randomised dose expansion of AZD8931 in combination with oxaliplatin and capecitabine chemotherapy in patients with oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

Anne Thomas, Pradeep S Virdee, Martin Eatock, Simon R Lord, Stephen Falk, D Alan Anthoney, Richard C Turkington, Matthew Goff, Leena Elhussein, Linda Collins and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Gastric Cancer Harboring anOncoTargets and therapy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anne ThomasUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, UK. Electronic address: at107@le.ac.uk.
Pradeep S VirdeeCentre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Martin EatockBelfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Simon R LordUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Stephen FalkBristol Haematology & Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK.
D Alan AnthoneySt. James University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Richard C TurkingtonCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Matthew GoffOncology Clinical Trials Office, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Leena ElhusseinCentre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Linda CollinsOncology Clinical Trials Office, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sharon LoveCentre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Joanna MoschandreasCentre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mark R MiddletonUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, UK.
University of Oxford · GBAt Bristol · GBBelfast City Hospital · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14112Cancer Research UK 16895Cancer Research UK C5529/A16895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAZD8931 has equipotent activity against epidermal growth factor receptor, erbB2, and erbB3. Primary objectives were to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of AZD8931 + chemotherapy, and subsequently assess safety/preliminary clinical activity in patients with operable oesophagogastric cancer (OGC).

methodsAZD8931 (20 mg, 40 mg or 60 mg bd) was given with Xelox (oxaliplatin + capecitabine) for eight 21-day cycles, continuously or with intermittent schedule (4 days on/3 off every week; 14 days on/7 off, per cycle) in a rolling-six design. Subsequently, patients with OGC were randomised 2:1 to AZD8931 + Xelox at RP2D or Xelox only for two cycles, followed by radical oesophagogastric surgery. Secondary outcomes were safety, complete resection (R0) rate, six-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival.

resultsDuring escalation, four dose-limiting toxicities were observed among 24 patients: skin rash (1) and failure to deliver 100% of Xelox because of treatment-associated grade III-IV adverse events (AEs) (3: diarrhoea and vomiting; vomiting; fatigue). Serious adverse events (SAE) occurred in 15 of 24 (63%) patients. RP2D was 20-mg bd with the 4/3 schedule. In the expansion phase, 2 of 20 (10%) patients in the Xelox + AZD8931 group and 5/10 (50%) patients in the Xelox group had grade III-IV AEs. Six-month PFS was 85% (90% CI: 66%-94%) in Xelox + AZD8931 and 100% in Xelox alone. Seven deaths (35%) occurred with Xelox + AZD8931 and one (10%) with Xelox. R0 rate was 45% (9/20) with Xelox + AZD8931 and 90% (9/10) with Xelox-alone (P = 0.024).

conclusionXelox + AZD8931 (20 mg bd 4/3 days) has an acceptable safety profile administered as neoadjuvant therapy in operable patients with OGC. (Trial registration: EudraCT 2011-003169-13, ISRCTN-68093791).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineDiarrheaErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionExanthemaFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedAZD 8931CapecitabineERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesERBB3 protein, humanOxaliplatinOxaloacetatesQuinazolinesReceptor, ErbB-3AZD8931Dual erbB inhibitorOesophagogastric cancer

Identifiers

PMID31765988
PMCPMC6947485
OpenAlexW2990253746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.