ArticlePloS one2019
Proton pencil minibeam irradiation of an in-vivo mouse ear model spares healthy tissue dependent on beam size.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined minibeam and conventional radiotherapy reduces severe skin toxicity and improves tumor control.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cell survival comparison of proton, helium, and carbon ion interlaced minibeams in water phantom simulations.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Applying Proton Minibeam Technology on the Proton Therapy Complex "Prometheus".Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2026Article
- Collimated and non-collimated proton minibeam irradiation using SIRMIO: a simulation study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Long-term application of MC903 in mice prolongs the characteristic symptoms of atopic dermatitis, such as inflammation, skin barrier dysfunction, and itching.Experimental animals · 2025Article
- Proton minibeam radiotherapy: a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Particle Beam Radiobiology Status and Challenges: A PTCOG Radiobiology Subcommittee Report.International journal of particle therapy · 2024Review
- Proton-FLASH: effects of ultra-high dose rate irradiation on an in-vivo mouse ear model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Design and dosimetric characterization of a transportable proton minibeam collimation system.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- High-LET charged particles: radiobiology and application for new approaches in radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023Review
- Longitudinally Heterogeneous Tumor Dose Optimizes Proton Broadbeam, Interlaced Minibeam, and FLASH Therapy.Cancers · 2022Article
- Article
- Radiobiological and Treatment-Related Aspects of Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Planar Proton Minibeam Irradiation Elicits Spatially Confined DNA Damage in a Human Epidermis Model.Cancers · 2022Article
- Article
- Conceptual Design of a Novel Nozzle Combined with a Clinical Proton Linac for Magnetically Focussed Minibeams.Cancers · 2021Article
- Optimizing proton minibeam radiotherapy by interlacing and heterogeneous tumor dose on the basis of calculated clonogenic cell survival.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- CeCILE - An Artificial Intelligence Based Cell-Detection for the Evaluation of Radiation Effects in Eucaryotic Cells.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy using minibeams of sub-millimeter dimensions reduces side effects in comparison to conventional proton therapy due to spatial fractionation. Since the proton minibeams widen with depth, the homogeneous irradiation of a tumor can be ensured by adjusting the beam distances to tumor size and depth to maintain tumor control as in conventional proton therapy. The inherent advantages of protons in comparison to photons like a limited range that prevents a dosage of distal tissues are maintained by proton minibeams and can even be exploited for interlacing from different beam directions. A first animal study was conducted to systematically investigate and quantify the tissue-sparing effects of proton pencil minibeams as a function of beam size and dose distributions, using beam widths between σ = 95, 199, 306, 411, 561 and 883 μm (standard deviation) at a defined center-to-center beam distance (ctc) of 1.8 mm. The average dose of 60 Gy was distributed in 4x4 minibeams using 20 MeV protons (LET ~ 2.7 keV/μm). The induced radiation toxicities were measured by visible skin reactions and ear swelling for 90 days after irradiation. The largest applied beam size to ctc ratio (σ/ctc = 0.49) is similar to a homogeneous irradiation and leads to a significant 3-fold ear thickness increase compared to the control group. Erythema and desquamation was also increased significantly 3-4 weeks after irradiation. With decreasing beam sizes and thus decreasing σ/ctc, the maximum skin reactions are strongly reduced until no ear swelling or other visible skin reactions should occur for σ/ctc < 0.032 (extrapolated from data). These results demonstrate that proton pencil minibeam radiotherapy has better tissue-sparing for smaller σ/ctc, corresponding to larger peak-to-valley dose ratios PVDR, with the best effect for σ/ctc < 0.032. However, even quite large σ/ctc (e.g. σ/ctc = 0.23 or 0.31, i.e. PVDR = 10 or 2.7) show less acute side effects than a homogeneous dose distribution. This suggests that proton minibeam therapy spares healthy tissue not only in the skin but even for dose distributions appearing in deeper layers close to the tumor enhancing its benefits for clinical proton therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.