Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31765391›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2019

The impact of genetic adaptation on chimpanzee subspecies differentiation.

Joshua M Schmidt, Marc de Manuel, Tomas Marques-Bonet, Sergi Castellano, Aida M Andrés

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Local genetic adaptation to habitat in wild chimpanzees.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Joshua M SchmidtUCL Genetics Institute, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5862-7389
Marc de ManuelInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Barcelona, Spain.
Tomas Marques-BonetInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5597-3075
Sergi CastellanoMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5819-4210
Aida M AndrésUCL Genetics Institute, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8590-9672
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ES

Funding

Department of Health 14/21/45Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 204841/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimpanzees, humans' closest relatives, are in danger of extinction. Aside from direct human impacts such as hunting and habitat destruction, a key threat is transmissible disease. As humans continue to encroach upon their habitats, which shrink in size and grow in density, the risk of inter-population and cross-species viral transmission increases, a point dramatically made in the reverse with the global HIV/AIDS pandemic. Inhabiting central Africa, the four subspecies of chimpanzees differ in demographic history and geographical range, and are likely differentially adapted to their particular local environments. To quantitatively explore genetic adaptation, we investigated the genic enrichment for SNPs highly differentiated between chimpanzee subspecies. Previous analyses of such patterns in human populations exhibited limited evidence of adaptation. In contrast, chimpanzees show evidence of recent positive selection, with differences among subspecies. Specifically, we observe strong evidence of recent selection in eastern chimpanzees, with highly differentiated SNPs being uniquely enriched in genic sites in a way that is expected under recent adaptation but not under neutral evolution or background selection. These sites are enriched for genes involved in immune responses to pathogens, and for genes inferred to differentiate the immune response to infection by simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) in natural vs. non-natural host species. Conversely, central chimpanzees exhibit an enrichment of signatures of positive selection only at cytokine receptors, due to selective sweeps in CCR3, CCR9 and CXCR6 -paralogs of CCR5 and CXCR4, the two major receptors utilized by HIV to enter human cells. Thus, our results suggest that positive selection has contributed to the genetic and phenotypic differentiation of chimpanzee subspecies, and that viruses likely play a predominate role in this differentiation, with SIV being a likely selective agent. Interestingly, our results suggest that SIV has elicited distinctive adaptive responses in these two chimpanzee subspecies.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsDemographyGenetic DriftGenetic SpeciationHIVHumansImmunity, InnatePan troglodytesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReceptors, CCRReceptors, CCR3Receptors, CCR5Receptors, CXCR4Receptors, CXCR6Selection, GeneticCC chemokine receptor 9CCR3 protein, humanCCR5 protein, humanCXCR6 protein, humanReceptors, CCRReceptors, CCR3Receptors, CCR5Receptors, CXCR4Receptors, CXCR6

Identifiers

PMID31765391
PMCPMC6901233
OpenAlexW2989765378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.