Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31765023›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2020

Modularity and evolution of flower shape: the role of function, development, and spandrels in Erica.

Dieter Reich, Andreas Berger, Maria von Balthazar, Marion Chartier, Mahboubeh Sherafati, Jürg Schönenberger, Sara Manafzadeh, Yannick M Staedler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dieter ReichDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Division of Evolutionary and Systematic Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna, 1030, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0784-0048
Andreas BergerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Division of Evolutionary and Systematic Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna, 1030, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3902-3827
Maria von BalthazarDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Division of Structural and Functional Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna, 1030, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7436-3582
Marion ChartierDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Division of Structural and Functional Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna, 1030, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6757-4760
Mahboubeh SherafatiDepartment of Plant Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 14115-154, Iran.
Jürg SchönenbergerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Division of Structural and Functional Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna, 1030, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6791-2731
Sara ManafzadehDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, Zürich, 8092, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9017-1230
Yannick M StaedlerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Division of Structural and Functional Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna, 1030, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0688-6995
University of Vienna · ATETH Zurich · CHTarbiat Modares University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flowers have been hypothesized to contain either modules of attraction and reproduction, functional modules (pollination-effecting parts) or developmental modules (organ-specific). Do pollination specialization and syndromes influence floral modularity? In order to test these hypotheses and answer this question, we focused on the genus Erica: we gathered 3D data from flowers of 19 species with diverse syndromes via computed tomography, and for the first time tested the above-mentioned hypotheses via 3D geometric morphometrics. To provide an evolutionary framework for our results, we tested the evolutionary mode of floral shape, size and integration under the syndromes regime, and - for the first time - reconstructed the high-dimensional floral shape of their most recent common ancestor. We demonstrate that the modularity of the 3D shape of generalist flowers depends on development and that of specialists is linked to function: modules of pollen deposition and receipt in bird syndrome, and access-restriction to the floral reward in long-proboscid fly syndrome. Only size and shape principal component 1 showed multiple-optima selection, suggesting that they were co-opted during evolution to adapt flowers to novel pollinators. Whole floral shape followed an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (selection-driven) evolutionary model, and differentiated relatively late. Flower shape modularity thus crucially depends on pollinator specialization and syndrome.

Indexed as

EricaceaeFlowersPollinationAnimalsBirdsPollendevelopmental modularityflower shapefunctional modularityintegrationmodularitypollination syndromespandrel

Identifiers

PMID31765023
PMCPMC7065081
OpenAlexW2991468749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.