Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31764740›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2019

Patient Experiences With Miscarriage Management in the Emergency and Ambulatory Settings.

Carolyn A Miller, Andrea H Roe, Arden McAllister, Zachary F Meisel, Nathanael Koelper, Courtney A Schreiber

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Medication Management of Early Pregnancy Loss in an Urban Texas Emergency Department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Lived experiences of women with spontaneous abortion at a district hospital, South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Psychologic Sequelae in Early Pregnancy Complications.International journal of women's health · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Suspected Miscarriage in the Experience of Emergency Medical Services Teams-Preliminary Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolyn A MillerDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Andrea H Roe
Arden McAllister
Zachary F Meisel
Nathanael Koelper
Courtney A Schreiber
Creative Commons · US

Funding

Comparative Effectiveness of Pregnancy Failure Management Regimens (Pre-Fai-R)R01HD071920 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SCHREIBER, COURTNEY A. · 2013 to 2017
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD071920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo quantitatively and qualitatively describe the patient experience for clinically stable patients presenting with miscarriage to the emergency department (ED) or ambulatory clinics.

methodsWe present a subanalysis of a mixed-methods study from 2016 on factors that influence miscarriage treatment decision-making among clinically stable patients. Fifty-four patients were evaluated based on location of miscarriage care (ED or ambulatory-only), and novel parameters were assessed including timeline (days) from presentation to miscarriage resolution, number of health system interactions, and number of specialty-based provider care teams seen. We explored themes around patient satisfaction through in-depth narrative interviews.

resultsMedian time to miscarriage resolution was 11 days (range 5-57) (ED) and 8 days (range 0-47) (ambulatory-only). We recorded a mean of 4.4±1.4 (ED) and 3.0±1.2 (ambulatory-only) separate care teams and a median of 13 (range 8-20) (ED) and 19 (range 8-22) (ambulatory-only) health system interactions. Patients seeking care in the ED were younger (28.3 vs 34.0, odds ratio [OR] 5.8, 95% CI 1.8-18.7), more likely to be of black race (28.3 vs 34.0, OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.1-10.0), uninsured or insured through Medicaid (16 vs 6, OR 6.8, 95% CI 2.1-22.5), and more likely to meet criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder when compared with ambulatory-only patients (10 vs 3, OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.5-23.4). Patients valued diagnostic clarity, timeliness, and individualized care. We found that ED patients reported a lack of clarity surrounding their diagnosis, inefficient care, and a mixed experience with health care provider sensitivity. In contrast, ambulatory-only patients described a streamlined and sensitive care experience.

conclusionPatients seeking miscarriage care in the ED were more likely to be socioeconomically and psychosocially vulnerable and were less satisfied with their care compared with those seen in the ambulatory setting alone. Expedited evaluation of early pregnancy problems, with attention to clear communication and emotional sensitivity, may optimize the patient experience.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth Services AccessibilityPatient SatisfactionPrenatal CareAbortion, SpontaneousAdultAmbulatory CareEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaternal Health ServicesPennsylvaniaPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31764740
PMCPMC6882532
OpenAlexW2983082792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.