Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31764612›Full record

Observational studyRetina (Philadelphia, Pa.)2020

RANIBIZUMAB TREATMENT IN TREATMENT-NAIVE NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: Results From LUMINOUS, a Global Real-World Study.

Frank G Holz, Marta S Figueroa, Francesco Bandello, Yit Yang, Masahito Ohji, Hong Dai, Halina Wykrota, Sanjay Sharma, Cornelia Dunger-Baldauf, Sue Lacey and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Ranibizumab biosimilars vs. reference Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Frank G HolzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Marta S FigueroaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Francesco BandelloDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Vita-Salute, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Yit YangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wolverhampton Eye Infirmary, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.
Masahito OhjiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Hong DaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
Halina WykrotaDepartment of Ophthalmology, I Kliniki Okulistyki Slaskiej Akademii Medycznej, Katowicach, Poland.
Sanjay SharmaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Cornelia Dunger-BaldaufDepartment of Ophthalmology, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Sue LaceyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited, Frimley, Camberley, United Kingdom; and.
Wayne MacfaddenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Paul MitchellCentre for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
all the LUMINOUS study investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and treatment patterns of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in treatment-naive patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration enrolled in LUMINOUS study.

methodsThis 5-year, prospective, multicenter, observational study recruited 30,138 adult patients (treatment-naive or previously treated with ranibizumab or other ocular treatments) who were treated according to the local ranibizumab label.

resultsSix thousand two hundred and forty-one treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients were recruited. Baseline (BL) demographics were, mean (SD) age 75.0 (10.2) years, 54.9% females, and 66.5% Caucasian. The mean (SD) visual acuity (VA; letters) gain at 1 year was 3.1 (16.51) (n = 3,379; BLVA, 51.9 letters [Snellen: 20/92]) with a mean (SD) of 5.0 (2.7) injections and 8.8 (3.3) monitoring visits. Presented by injection frequencies <3 (n = 537), 3 to 6 (n = 1,924), and >6 (n = 918), visual acuity gains were 1.6 (14.93), 3.3 (16.57), and 3.7 (17.21) letters, respectively. Stratified by BLVA <23 (n = 382), 23 to <39 (n = 559), 39 to <60 (n = 929), 60 to <74 (n = 994), and ≥74 (n = 515), visual acuity change was 12.6 (20.63), 6.7 (17.88), 3.6 (16.41), 0.3 (13.83), and -3.0 (11.82) letters, respectively. The incidence of ocular/nonocular adverse events was 8.2%/12.8% and serious adverse events were 0.9%/7.4%, respectively.

conclusionThese results demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of ranibizumab in treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsChoroidal NeovascularizationFemaleHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRanibizumabTreatment OutcomeVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVisual AcuityWet Macular DegenerationAngiogenesis InhibitorsRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID31764612
PMCPMC7447127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.