ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2019
Public Health Practice-Driven Research to Improve HIV Prevention in the United States.
Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient Education and Decision Support for Long-Acting Injectable HIV Antiretroviral Therapy: Protocol for Tool Development and Pilot Testing with Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Medical Case Management Programs in New York.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Article
- Improving Care Outcomes for PLWH Experiencing Homelessness and Unstable Housing: a Synthetic Review of Clinic-Based Strategies.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2020Review
- Assessment of Public Health Impact of 20 Non-Research HIV Demonstration Projects by Use of the CDC Science Impact Framework, United States, 2018-2022.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe evidence-practice gap in HIV prevention and the care continuum in the United States often reflects a mismatch between the perspectives of researchers and public health practitioners. The traditional research paradigm of sequential progress from efficacy research to implementation in practice and widespread scale-up is not well-aligned with the reality of health department program implementation.
settingThis article focuses on public health practice carried out by state and local health departments in the United States and the research intended to inform it. METHODS AND
resultsIn this narrative review, we discuss approaches to HIV prevention and care continuum research that are shaped by and responsive to public health practice implementation priorities and what is needed to promote productive and successful university-health department research partnerships. We review research methods of particular relevance to health departments to evaluate the effectiveness of HIV prevention and care continuum interventions and how these approaches diverge from traditional research approaches. Finally, we highlight the roles of federal agencies in supporting practice-driven HIV implementation research.
conclusionsHealth departments are key stakeholders, consumers, and generators of the evidence base for public health practice. High-impact research to improve HIV prevention and the care continuum is informed by health department priorities and current practice from the start. Long-term, equitable relationships between universities and health departments are crucial to advance practice-driven research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.