Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31764198›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2020

Long-acting implants to treat and prevent HIV infection.

Ethel D Weld, Charles Flexner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Antiviral potency of long-acting islatravir subdermal implant in SHIV-infected macaques.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The LEAP Process: Streamlining the Development of Long-Acting Products and Formulations for Infectious Diseases.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ethel D WeldDivisions of Clinical Pharmacology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Charles Flexner
Johns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard E. Chaisson · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
The Johns Hopkins Baltimore-Washington-India Clinical Trials Unit (BWI CTU)UM1AI069465 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Charles W. Flexner, Amita Gupta · 2012 to 2026
$34.1M
The Long-Acting/Extended Release Antiretroviral Resource Program (LEAP)R24AI118397 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Charles W. Flexner · 2015 to 2026
$9.4M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NIAID NIH HHS R24 AI118397NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSubcutaneous implants are a promising technology to enable long-acting parenteral delivery of antiretroviral drugs (ARV) because they may be able to provide protective drugs concentrations for a year or longer following a single implant. The present review covers the current status of preclinical and clinical development of antiretroviral implants. RECENT

findingsOver the past three decades, subcutaneous implants have been widely used for long-acting hormonal contraception and the treatment of hormonally-driven malignancies. They are economical and scalable to manufacture, but require special procedures for insertion and removal. They are generally well tolerated, and can remain in place for up to five years. As long-acting delivery of ARV would confer significant advantages, a few investigational implants are under development for the delivery of ARV; most remain at preclinical stages of development. Islatravir, a potent nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor that shows particular promise, has entered clinical testing in implant form. Investigational implants containing tenofovir alafenamide and nevirapine, and entecavir (for hepatitis B virus) have been developed and tested in animal models, with varying degrees of success. There is also burgeoning interest in bioerodable implant formulations of established ARVs. SUMMARY: LARV implants are a promising new technology, but are in early stages of clinical development. Their potential advantages include more consistent and predictable drug release than that provided by intramuscular injections, the possibility of combining several partner drugs into one implant, and the fact that implants can be removed in the case of a desire to stop treatment or the development of adverse events.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsInfusion Pumps, ImplantableAnimalsAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsDrug CombinationsReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsDrug CombinationsReverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31764198
PMCPMC7050620
OpenAlexW2990418336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.