Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31764066›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2019

National HIV testing and diagnosis coverage in sub-Saharan Africa: a new modeling tool for estimating the 'first 90' from program and survey data.

Mathieu Maheu-Giroux, Kimberly Marsh, Carla M Doyle, Arnaud Godin, Charlotte Lanièce Delaunay, Leigh F Johnson, Andreas Jahn, Kouamé Abo, Francisco Mbofana, Marie-Claude Boily and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mathieu Maheu-GirouxaDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montréal, Canada bThe Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), Geneva, Switzerland cCentre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa dMinistry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi and I-TECH, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA eProgramme national de lutte contre le Sida, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire fNational AIDS Council, Maputo, Mozambique gDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Kimberly Marsh
Carla M Doyle
Arnaud Godin
Charlotte Lanièce Delaunay
Leigh F Johnson
Andreas Jahn
Kouamé Abo
Francisco Mbofana
Marie-Claude Boily
David L Buckeridge
Catherine A Hankins
Jeffrey W Eaton

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHIV testing services (HTS) are a crucial component of national HIV responses. Learning one's HIV diagnosis is the entry point to accessing life-saving antiretroviral treatment and care. Recognizing the critical role of HTS, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) launched the 90-90-90 targets stipulating that by 2020, 90% of people living with HIV know their status, 90% of those who know their status receive antiretroviral therapy, and 90% of those on treatment have a suppressed viral load. Countries will need to regularly monitor progress on these three indicators. Estimating the proportion of people living with HIV who know their status (i.e. the 'first 90'), however, is difficult.

methodsWe developed a mathematical model (henceforth referred to as 'Shiny90') that formally synthesizes population-based survey and HTS program data to estimate HIV status awareness over time. The proposed model uses country-specific HIV epidemic parameters from the standard UNAIDS Spectrum model to produce outputs that are consistent with other national HIV estimates. Shiny90 provides estimates of HIV testing history, diagnosis rates, and knowledge of HIV status by age and sex. We validate Shiny90 using both in-sample comparisons and out-of-sample predictions using data from three countries: Côte d'Ivoire, Malawi, and Mozambique.

resultsIn-sample comparisons suggest that Shiny90 can accurately reproduce longitudinal sex-specific trends in HIV testing. Out-of-sample predictions of the fraction of people living with HIV ever tested over a 4-to-6-year time horizon are also in good agreement with empirical survey estimates. Importantly, out-of-sample predictions of HIV knowledge of status are consistent (i.e. within 4% points) with those of the fully calibrated model in the three countries when HTS program data are included. The model's predictions of knowledge of status are higher than available self-reported HIV awareness estimates, however, suggesting - in line with previous studies - that these self-reports could be affected by nondisclosure of HIV status awareness.

conclusionKnowledge of HIV status is a key indicator to monitor progress, identify bottlenecks, and target HIV responses. Shiny90 can help countries track progress towards their 'first 90' by leveraging surveys of HIV testing behaviors and annual HTS program data.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAdolescentAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsCote d'IvoireFemaleHealth SurveysHIV InfectionsHumansMalawiMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMozambiqueSerologic TestsYoung AdultAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID31764066
PMCPMC6919235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.