Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31763529›Full record

ArticleACS omega2019

Agarose-Based Gel-Phase Microextraction Technique for Quick Sampling of Polar Analytes Adsorbed on Surfaces.

Pei-Han Liao, Pawel L Urban

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pei-Han LiaoDepartment of Chemistry and Frontier Research Center on Fundamental and Applied Sciences of Matters, National Tsing Hua University, 101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Pawel L UrbanDepartment of Chemistry and Frontier Research Center on Fundamental and Applied Sciences of Matters, National Tsing Hua University, 101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
National Tsing Hua University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sampling and extraction of chemical residues present on flat or curved surfaces as well as touch-sensitive objects are challenging. Hydrogels are characterized by high mechanical flexibility and water content. Thus, they are an ideal medium for transferring water-soluble analytes from a sampled surface to the next stage of an analytical workflow. Here, we demonstrate gel-phase microextraction (GPME), in which disks of blended hydrogels are utilized to lift traces of water-soluble substances adsorbed on surfaces. The protocol has been optimized in a series of tests involving fluorometric and mass spectrometric measurements. Compared with the pure agarose hydrogel, most of the tested blended hydrogels provide a higher efficiency for the sampling/extraction of a model analyte, fluorescein. The blended hydrogel disks are incorporated into three-dimensional (3D)-printed acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene chips to create easy-to-use sampling probes. We exemplify the suitability of this improved GPME approach in sampling chemical residues present on the skin, glass, and daily use objects. In these tests, the extracts were analyzed on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer fitted with an electrospray ion source operated in the positive- and negative-ion modes. The method enabled the detection of diclofenac on excised porcine skin fragments exposed to a topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and sweat residues (lactic acid) left on surfaces touched by humans. The limits of detection for diclofenac and lactic acid in hydrogel extract were 6.4 × 10

Identifiers

PMID31763529
PMCPMC6868603
OpenAlexW2986889549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.