Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31763494›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2019

Creating an academic research organization to efficiently design, conduct, coordinate, and analyze clinical trials: The Center for Clinical Trials & Data Coordination.

Kaleab Z Abebe, Andrew D Althouse, Diane Comer, Kyle Holleran, Glory Koerbel, Jason Kojtek, Joseph Weiss, Susan Spillane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kaleab Z AbebeCenter for Clinical Trials & Data Coordination, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Andrew D AlthouseCenter for Clinical Trials & Data Coordination, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Diane ComerCenter for Clinical Trials & Data Coordination, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kyle HolleranCenter for Clinical Trials & Data Coordination, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Glory KoerbelCenter for Clinical Trials & Data Coordination, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jason KojtekCenter for Clinical Trials & Data Coordination, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Joseph WeissCenter for Clinical Trials & Data Coordination, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Susan SpillaneCenter for Clinical Trials & Data Coordination, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When properly executed, the randomized controlled trial is one of the best vehicles for assessing the effectiveness of one or more interventions. However, numerous challenges may emerge in the areas of study startup, recruitment, data quality, cost, and reporting of results. The use of well-run coordinating centers could help prevent these issues, but very little exists in the literature describing their creation or the guiding principles behind their inception. The Center for Clinical Trials & Data Coordination (CCDC) was established in 2015 through institutional funds with the intent of 1) providing relevant expertise in clinical trial design, conduct, coordination, and analysis; 2) advancing the careers of clinical investigators and CCDC-affiliated faculty; and 3) obtaining large data coordinating center (DCC) grants. We describe the organizational structure of the CCDC as well as the homegrown clinical trial management system integrating nine crucial elements: electronic data capture, eligibility and randomization, drug and external data tracking, safety reporting, outcome adjudication, data and safety monitoring, statistical analysis and reporting, data sharing, and regulatory compliance. Lastly, we share numerous lessons that can be taken from our experience. Specifically, we focus on 1) funding for DCCs, 2) the importance of DCCs to clinical researchers, 3) the expertise of DCC personnel, and 4) continually striving to improve. In conclusion, the CCDC strives to provide high-quality support for the design, conduct, coordination, and analyses of clinical trials, and we hope this paper will serve as a blueprint for future clinical trialists involved in DCCs.

Indexed as

Clinical trial managementData coordinating center

Identifiers

PMID31763494
PMCPMC6861639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.