Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31763361›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology2019

Integrating neurophysiologic relevance feedback in intent modeling for information retrieval.

Giulio Jacucci, Oswald Barral, Pedram Daee, Markus Wenzel, Baris Serim, Tuukka Ruotsalo, Patrik Pluchino, Jonathan Freeman, Luciano Gamberini, Samuel Kaski and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Giulio JacucciHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science University of Helsinki P.O. Box 68, (Pietari Kalmin katu 5), Helsinki FI-00014 Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9185-7928
Oswald BarralHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science University of Helsinki P.O. Box 68, (Pietari Kalmin katu 5), Helsinki FI-00014 Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2354-3513
Pedram DaeeHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science Aalto University P.O.Box 15400, Aalto FI-00076 Finland.
Markus WenzelNeurotechnology Group Technische Universität Berlin Berlin 10587 Germany.
Baris SerimHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science University of Helsinki P.O. Box 68, (Pietari Kalmin katu 5), Helsinki FI-00014 Finland.
Tuukka RuotsaloHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science University of Helsinki P.O. Box 68, (Pietari Kalmin katu 5), Helsinki FI-00014 Finland.
Patrik PluchinoHuman Inspired Technology Research Centre University of Padova Via Luzzatti 4, Padova 35121 Italy.
Jonathan FreemanGoldsmiths University of London New Cross, London SE14 6NW UK.
Luciano GamberiniHuman Inspired Technology Research Centre University of Padova Via Luzzatti 4, Padova 35121 Italy.
Samuel KaskiHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science Aalto University P.O.Box 15400, Aalto FI-00076 Finland.
Benjamin BlankertzNeurotechnology Group Technische Universität Berlin Berlin 10587 Germany.
University of Helsinki · FIHelsinki Institute for Information Technology · FITechnische Universität Berlin · DEUniversity of Padua · ITGoldsmiths University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of implicit relevance feedback from neurophysiology could deliver effortless information retrieval. However, both computing neurophysiologic responses and retrieving documents are characterized by uncertainty because of noisy signals and incomplete or inconsistent representations of the data. We present the first-of-its-kind, fully integrated information retrieval system that makes use of online implicit relevance feedback generated from brain activity as measured through electroencephalography (EEG), and eye movements. The findings of the evaluation experiment (N = 16) show that we are able to compute online neurophysiology-based relevance feedback with performance significantly better than chance in complex data domains and realistic search tasks. We contribute by demonstrating how to integrate in interactive intent modeling this inherently noisy implicit relevance feedback combined with scarce explicit feedback. Although experimental measures of task performance did not allow us to demonstrate how the classification outcomes translated into search task performance, the experiment proved that our approach is able to generate relevance feedback from brain signals and eye movements in a realistic scenario, thus providing promising implications for future work in neuroadaptive information retrieval (IR).

Identifiers

PMID31763361
PMCPMC6853416
OpenAlexW2898389707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.