ArticleAvicenna journal of phytomedicine
Therapeutic potential of
Article in Avicenna journal of phytomedicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanistic pathways andIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Article
- Toxicological Assessment ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Exploring the roles of phytobiotics in relieving the impacts ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
- Protective Effect of Natural Antioxidants on Reducing Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity.Disease markers · 2022Review
- Article
- Gallic acid exerts anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative stress, and nephroprotective effects against paraquat-induced renal injury in male rats.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveParaquat is a herbicide with potent toxicity in humans and animals. This study aimed to evaluate the protective effects of MATERIALS AND
methodsWe randomly assigned forty male rats into five groups (G1-G5). The G1 was used as control; G2 only received paraquat (25 mg/kg body weight (bw)/day,
resultsIn G2, oral administration of paraquat significantly increased (p<0.05) serum Cr, urea, PC, and renal
conclusionOur results show that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.