Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31763156›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2019

Heat Shock Protein Inspired Nanochaperones Restore Amyloid-β Homeostasis for Preventative Therapy of Alzheimer's Disease.

Huiru Yang, Xinyu Li, Lin Zhu, Xiaohui Wu, Shaozhi Zhang, Fan Huang, Xizeng Feng, Linqi Shi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Huiru YangState Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology Key Laboratory of Functional Polymer Materials Ministry of Education Institute of Polymer Chemistry College of Chemistry Nankai University Tianjin 300071 P. R. China.
Xinyu LiState Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials Ministry of Education College of Life Sciences Nankai University Tianjin 300071 P. R. China.
Lin ZhuState Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology Key Laboratory of Functional Polymer Materials Ministry of Education Institute of Polymer Chemistry College of Chemistry Nankai University Tianjin 300071 P. R. China.
Xiaohui WuState Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology Key Laboratory of Functional Polymer Materials Ministry of Education Institute of Polymer Chemistry College of Chemistry Nankai University Tianjin 300071 P. R. China.
Shaozhi ZhangState Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials Ministry of Education College of Life Sciences Nankai University Tianjin 300071 P. R. China.
Fan HuangTianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine Institute of Radiation Medicine Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Tianjin 300192 P. R. China.
Xizeng FengState Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials Ministry of Education College of Life Sciences Nankai University Tianjin 300071 P. R. China.
Linqi ShiState Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology Key Laboratory of Functional Polymer Materials Ministry of Education Institute of Polymer Chemistry College of Chemistry Nankai University Tianjin 300071 P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9534-795X
Nankai University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyloid beta (Aβ) aggregation is generally believed as the crucial and primary cause of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, current Aβ-targeted therapeutic strategies show limited disease-modifying efficacy due to the irreversible damages in the late stage of AD, thus the treatment should be given before the formation of deposition and target primary Aβ species rather than advanced plaques. Herein, inspired by heat shock protein, a self-assembly nanochaperone based on mixed-shell polymeric micelle (MSPM) is devised to act as a novel strategy for AD prevention. With unique surface hydrophobic domains, this nanochaperone can selectively capture Aβ peptides, effectively suppress Aβ aggregation, and remarkably reduce Aβ-mediated cytotoxicity. Moreover, the formed nanochaperone-Aβ complex after Aβ adsorption can be easily phagocytosed by microglia and thereby facilitates Aβ clearance. As a result, the nanochaperone reduces Aβ burden, attenuates Aβ-induced inflammation, and eventually rescues the cognitive deficits of APP/PS1 transgenic AD mice. These results indicate that this biomimetic nanochaperone can successfully prevent the onset of AD symptoms and serve as a promising candidate for prophylactic treatment of AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseamyloid beta peptidespolymeric micellesprecautionself‐assembly nanochaperones

Identifiers

PMID31763156
PMCPMC6864524
OpenAlexW2974574046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.