Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31763143›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2019

Tissue-Engineered Neural Network Graft Relays Excitatory Signal in the Completely Transected Canine Spinal Cord.

Bi-Qin Lai, Ming-Tian Che, Bo Feng, Yu-Rong Bai, Ge Li, Yuan-Huan Ma, Lai-Jian Wang, Meng-Yao Huang, Ya-Qiong Wang, Bin Jiang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bi-Qin LaiKey Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering (Sun Yat-sen University) Ministry of Education Guangzhou 510080 China.
Ming-Tian CheKey Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering (Sun Yat-sen University) Ministry of Education Guangzhou 510080 China.
Bo FengKey Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering (Sun Yat-sen University) Ministry of Education Guangzhou 510080 China.
Yu-Rong BaiKey Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering (Sun Yat-sen University) Ministry of Education Guangzhou 510080 China.
Ge LiKey Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering (Sun Yat-sen University) Ministry of Education Guangzhou 510080 China.
Yuan-Huan MaDepartment of Histology and Embryology Zhongshan School of Medicine Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou 510080 China.
Lai-Jian WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease Zhongshan School of Medicine Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou 510080 China.
Meng-Yao HuangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease Zhongshan School of Medicine Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou 510080 China.
Ya-Qiong WangDepartment of Electron Microscope Zhongshan School of Medicine Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou 510080 China.
Bin JiangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease Zhongshan School of Medicine Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou 510080 China.
Ying DingDepartment of Histology and Embryology Zhongshan School of Medicine Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou 510080 China.
Xiang ZengKey Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering (Sun Yat-sen University) Ministry of Education Guangzhou 510080 China.
Yuan-Shan ZengKey Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering (Sun Yat-sen University) Ministry of Education Guangzhou 510080 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3804-5792
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering produces constructs with defined functions for the targeted treatment of damaged tissue. A complete spinal cord injury (SCI) model is generated in canines to test whether in vitro constructed neural network (NN) tissues can relay the excitatory signal across the lesion gap to the caudal spinal cord. Established protocols are used to construct neural stem cell (NSC)-derived NN tissue characterized by a predominantly neuronal population with robust trans-synaptic activities and myelination. The NN tissue is implanted into the gap immediately following complete transection SCI of canines at the T10 spinal cord segment. The data show significant motor recovery of paralyzed pelvic limbs, as evaluated by Olby scoring and cortical motor evoked potential (CMEP) detection. The NN tissue survives in the lesion area with neuronal phenotype maintenance, improves descending and ascending nerve fiber regeneration, and synaptic integration with host neural circuits that allow it to serve as a neuronal relay to transmit excitatory electrical signal across the injured area to the caudal spinal cord. These results suggest that tissue-engineered NN grafts can relay the excitatory signal in the completely transected canine spinal cord, providing a promising strategy for SCI treatment in large animals, including humans.

Indexed as

canineneural network tissueneuronal relayspinal cord injuryTrkC

Identifiers

PMID31763143
PMCPMC6864506
OpenAlexW2973946155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.