Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31763076›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Acquisition of fungi from the environment modifies ambrosia beetle mycobiome during invasion.

Davide Rassati, Lorenzo Marini, Antonino Malacrinò

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Fungal backpackers-the mycobiome ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. How host species and body part determine the microbial communities of five ambrosia beetle species.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Flexibility in the ambrosia symbiosis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Characterization of TwoJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Davide RassatiDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Lorenzo MariniDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Antonino MalacrinòDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial symbionts can play critical roles when their host attempts to colonize a new habitat. The lack of symbiont adaptation can in fact hinder the invasion process of their host. This scenario could change if the exotic species are able to acquire microorganisms from the invaded environment. Understanding the ecological factors that influence the take-up of new microorganisms is thus essential to clarify the mechanisms behind biological invasions. In this study, we tested whether different forest habitats influence the structure of the fungal communities associated with ambrosia beetles. We collected individuals of the most widespread exotic (

Indexed as

Exotic pestMetabarcodingXyleborinus saxeseniiXylosandrus germanus

Identifiers

PMID31763076
PMCPMC6870512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.