ArticleFood science & nutrition2019
Nondestructive detection of apple crispness via optical fiber spectroscopy based on effective wavelengths.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of new hyperspectral index and machine learning models for prediction of winter wheat leaf water content.Plant methods · 2021Article
- Nondestructive monitoring storage quality of apples at different temperatures by near-infrared transmittance spectroscopy.Food science & nutrition · 2020Article
- Nondestructive detection of apple crispness via optical fiber spectroscopy based on effective wavelengths.Food science & nutrition · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crispness is regarded as a significant quality index for apples. Currently, destructive sensory evaluation is the accepted method used to detect apple crispness, making it essential to develop a method that can detect apple crispness in a nondestructive manner. In this study, spectroscopy was proposed as the nondestructive technique for detecting apples' crispness, ultimately obtaining a spectral reflectance curve between 450 nm and 1,000 nm. In order to simplify and improve modeling efficiency, successive projections algorithm (SPA) and x-loading weights (x-LW) methods were used to select the most effective wavelengths. Partial least squares (PLS) algorithm, radial basis neural networks (RBNN), and multilayer perceptron neural networks (MLPNN) methods were used to establish the models and to predict the crispness of "Fuji" and "Qinguan" apple varieties. Based on the full wavelength (FW), the prediction accuracy of the PLS model for "Fuji" and "Qinguan" apple varieties was 92.05% and 95.87%, respectively. The effective wavelengths selected via SPA for the "Fuji" apple variety were 450.41 nm, 476.80 nm, 677.75 nm, and 750.72 nm, and the effective wavelengths selected via x-LW for the "Qinguan" apple variety were 542.51 nm, 544.79 nm, 676.96 nm, and 718.29 nm. The prediction accuracy of the PLS model based on effective wavelengths for "Fuji" and "Qinguan" apple varieties reached 91.31% and 96.41%, respectively. Compared with the RBNN model, the MLPNN model achieved better prediction results for both "Fuji" and "Qinguan" apples, with the prediction accuracy reaching 97.8% and 99.9%, respectively. Based on the above findings, effective wavelength selection and MLPNN modeling were able to detect apple crispness with the highest accuracy. Overall, it can be concluded that the less effective wavelengths are conducive to developing an instrument for crispness detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.