Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31762790›Full record

ArticleJournal of infection prevention2019

Using debate to educate young people in schools about antibiotic use and resistance: A before and after evaluation using a questionnaire survey.

Vicki L Young, Mark Berry, Neville Q Verlander, Andy Ridgway, Cliodna Am McNulty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of infection prevention, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vicki L YoungMicrobiology Department, Public Health England Primary Care Unit, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK.
Mark BerryDepartment of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, UK.
Neville Q VerlanderModelling and Economics Department, Statistics, Public Health England, Colindale, London, UK.
Andy RidgwayDepartment of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, UK.
Cliodna Am McNultyMicrobiology Department, Public Health England Primary Care Unit, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of debating as an educational tool is increasing in popularity. Students who take part in debates can develop a range of skills such as confidence and communication as well as gaining a greater understanding of the topic discussed. Within this study we have evaluated an antibiotic-resistant debate kit, assessing the ability of the debate lesson to improve student knowledge and awareness around antibiotics.

methodsThe debate lesson was delivered in seven schools across South West England to 235 students aged 13-16 years. Change in student knowledge was measured using before and after knowledge questionnaires. Student and teacher feedback and suggestions for improvements for the lesson were also collected through questionnaires and interviews.

resultsQuantitative questionnaires found a significant improvement in knowledge for most areas covered in the debate, particularly around the use of antibiotics to treat colds and bacteria developing resistance. Teachers felt their students engaged well with the debate session and made suggestions for minor modifications that could improve the lesson.

conclusionsThe results suggest that the e-Bug antibiotic resistant debate kit is able to improve knowledge in young people around antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. Furthermore, the lesson was enjoyed by students and therefore this resource should be promoted more widely to teachers and schools.

Indexed as

antibioticsantimicrobial resistancechildrenEducationhealthcare-associated infectionsinfection preventionmicrobiologyprimary careyoung people

Identifiers

PMID31762790
PMCPMC6851618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.