Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31762576›Full record

ArticleActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2019

Development of Decision Support System to Predict Neurofeedback Response in ADHD: an Artificial Neural Network Approach.

Leila Shahmoradi, Zahra Liraki, Mahtab Karami, Behrouz Alizadeh Savareh, Masoud Nosratabadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leila ShahmoradiHalal Research Center of IRI, FDA, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra LirakiDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahtab KaramiDepartment of Health, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Behrouz Alizadeh SavarehDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Masoud NosratabadiDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinical decision support system (CDSS) is an analytical tool that converts raw data into useful information to help clinicians make better decisions for patients.

aimThe purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of neurofeedback (NF), in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) by the development of CDSS based on artificial neural network (ANN).

methodsThis study analyzed 122 patients with ADHD who underwent NF in the Parand-Human Potential Empowerment Institute in Tehran. The patients were divided into two groups according to the effects of NF: effective and non-effective groups. The patients' record information was mined by data mining techniques to identify effective features. Based on unsaturated condition of data and imbalanced classes between the patient groups (patients with successful NF response and those without it), the SMOTE technique was applied on dataset. Using MATLAB 2014a, a modular program was designed to test both multiple architectures of neural networks and their performance. Selected architecture of the neural networks was then applied in the procedure.

resultsEleven features from 28 features of the initial dataset were selected as effective features. Using the SMOTE technique, number of the samples rose to around 300 samples. Based on the multiple neural networks architecture testing, a network by 11-20-16-2 neurons was selected (specify>00.91%, sensivity=100%) and applied in the software.

conclusionThe ANN used in this study has led to good results in sensivity, specificity, and AUC. The ANN and other intelligent techniques can be used as supportive tools for decision making by healthcare providers.

Indexed as

Artificial neural networkAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDecision support systemNeurofeedback

Identifiers

PMID31762576
PMCPMC6853721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.