Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31762501›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of microbiology2019

Synthetic Biology Perspectives of Microbial Enzymes and Their Innovative Applications.

Pratyoosh Shukla

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nanotechnology and Agricultural Sustainability: A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. A Special Phenotype of AconidialJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Indian journal of microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Phe-140 Determines the Catalytic Efficiency of Arylacetonitrilase fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pratyoosh ShuklaEnzyme Technology and Protein Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana 124001 India.ORCID 0000-0002-9307-4126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial enzymes are high in demand and there is focus on their efficient, cost effective and eco-friendly production. The relevant microbial enzymes for respective industries needs to be identified but the conventional technologies don't have much edge over it. So, there is more attention towards high throughput methods for production of efficient enzymes. The enzymes produced by microbes need to be modified to bear the extreme conditions of the industries in order to get prolific outcomes and here the synthetic biology tools may be augmented to modify such microbes and enzymes. These tools are applied to synthesize novel and efficient enzymes. Use of computational tools for enzyme modification has provided new avenues for faster and specific modification of enzymes in a shorter time period. This review focuses on few important enzymes and their modification through synthetic biology tools including genetic modification, nanotechnology, post translational modification.

Indexed as

Enzyme modificationMicrobial enzymesNanotechnologySynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID31762501
PMCPMC6842371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.