ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2020
Comparison between Patients with Chest Infection due to Klebsiella spp. and Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Genomic characterization of a new phage BUCT541 againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- The Association Between Pleural Empyema and Peripheral Arterial Disease in Younger Patients: A Retrospective National Population-Based Cohort Study.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Case Report: Next-Generation Sequencing in Diagnosis of Atypical Aspiration Pneumonia.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective In Japan, the aging demographic structure is becoming pronounced, and the full-blown graying of society appears not far off, which indicates an increasing population that will require healthcare contact. Klebsiella spp. are major pathogens in healthcare-associated infections, and their importance is increasing. The aim of this study was to clarify the characteristics of Klebsiella spp. chest infections by evaluating the differences in the characteristics of chest infections caused by Klebsiella spp. and pneumoniae. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive patients hospitalized with pneumonia, lung abscess/necrotizing pneumonia, and empyema due to Klebsiella spp. and S. pneumoniae for 15 years at our institution in Saitama, Japan. Patients Patients with chest infections due to Klebsiella spp. (K group, n=76) and S. pneumoniae (S group, n=446) were included. Results The K group more frequently was male, older, coinfected by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and had diabetes mellitus, a history of upper digestive system surgery, alcohol drinking habit, a smoking habit, and an impaired premorbid performance status than the S group. The percentages of lung abscesses or necrotizing pneumonia (31.6% vs. 0.9%) and empyema without pulmonary parenchymal shadow (3.9% vs. 0.7%) were higher in the K group than those in the S group. Severity on admission and mortality did not differ between the groups; however, patients in the K group required a longer duration of antibiotics administration and hospital stay than those in the S group. Conclusion Klebsiella spp. chest infections have some marked characteristics when compared with pneumococcal infections, and our results serve to differentiate Klebsiella spp. infection from pneumococcal infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.