ArticleBiomaterials2020
Fabricating mechanically improved silk-based vascular grafts by solution control of the gel-spinning process.
Article in Biomaterials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- ProlongedACS omega · 2026Article
- Biomimetic hydrogel design strategies for vascular grafts and vascularized tissue constructs.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- A bio-inspired screwed small-diameter vascular graft for endotheliazation and arterial regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Biomimetic fabricated tubular graftBioactive materials · 2025Article
- Improved porosity promotes reendothelialization and smooth muscle remodeling in decellularized tissue-engineered vascular grafts.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Enhanced osteogenic potential of spider silk fibroin-based composite scaffolds incorporating carboxymethyl cellulose for bone tissue engineering.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2024Article
- Microstructured silk fiber scaffolds with enhanced stretchability.Biomaterials science · 2024Article
- Bacterial Nanocellulose Hydrogel: A Promising Alternative Material for the Fabrication of Engineered Vascular Grafts.Polymers · 2023Review
- Biological Materials for Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts: Overview of Recent Advancements.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- In-vivo evaluation of silk fibroin small-diameter vascular grafts: state of art of preclinical studies and animal models.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
- A novel enzyme-linked immunostaining technique based on silk membrane for the prenatal detection of fetomaternal haemorrhage.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Recombinant DTβ4-inspired porous 3D vascular graft enhanced antithrombogenicity and recruited circulating CD93Science advances · 2022Article
- Review of Polymeric Biomimetic Small-Diameter Vascular Grafts to Tackle Intimal Hyperplasia.ACS omega · 2022Review
- Bioinspired Silk Fibroin-Based Composite Grafts as Bone Tunnel Fillers for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Electrospun strong, bioactive, and bioabsorbable silk fibroin/poly (L-lactic-acid) nanoyarns for constructing advanced nanotextile tissue scaffolds.Materials today. Bio · 2022Article
- The Regulatory Effect of Braided Silk Fiber Skeletons with Differential Porosities on In Vivo Vascular Tissue Regeneration and Long-Term Patency.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- Design and characterization of small-diameter tissue-engineered blood vessels constructed by electrospun polyurethane-core and gelatin-shell coaxial fiber.Bioengineered · 2021Article
- CCL2 loaded microparticles promote acute patency in silk-based vascular grafts implanted in rat aortae.Acta biomaterialia · 2021Article
- Elastin-like polypeptide modified silk fibroin porous scaffold promotes osteochondral repair.Bioactive materials · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
There is a large unmet need for off-the-shelf biomaterial options to supplant venous autografts in bypass and reconstructive surgical procedures. Existing graft alternatives formed from non-degradable synthetic polymers are not capable of maintaining long-term patency and are thus not indicated for <6 mm inner diameter bypass procedures. To fill this void, degradable silk-based biomaterials have been proposed that can maintain their mechanical properties (i.e. compliance) while facilitating slow but progressive biomaterial remodeling and host integration mediated by cellular colonization. The goal of the present study was to enhance the porosity of gel-spun silk tubes, to facilitate faster degradation rates and improve cellularity, and thus improve host integration over time in vivo, while maintaining requisite mechanical functions. Silk solutions with a range of molecular weight distributions and, in turn, viscosities were used to generate tubes of varying porosities. A decrease in solution concentration correlated with an increase in mean pore size and overall porosity through a density-dependent mechanism. Tubes were mechanically analyzed, and these properties were the basis of an analytical model used to correlate tube formulations to structural compliance, which were shown to be similar to the saphenous vein. Tubes were also tested for suture retention to ensure surgical utility despite increased porosity. Tubes were implanted in the abdominal aorta of Sprague-Dawley rats via an end-to-end anastomosis model. Tubes with higher porosities showed early improvements in cell colonization that progressively increased over time; conversely, the dense architecture of less porous grafts (20MB) inhibited cell ingrowth and resulted in minimal biomaterial degradation at the 6-month time point. None of the highly porous tubes (5 MB and 10MB) remained patent at 6 months, likely due remodeling inducing bulk mechanical failure or a compromised blood-material interface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.