Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31761485›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2020

Fabricating mechanically improved silk-based vascular grafts by solution control of the gel-spinning process.

Maria Rodriguez, Jonathan A Kluge, Daniel Smoot, Matthew A Kluge, Daniel F Schmidt, Christopher R Paetsch, Peter S Kim, David L Kaplan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ProlongedACS omega · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Biomimetic fabricated tubular graftBioactive materials · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria RodriguezTufts University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Jonathan A KlugeTufts University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Daniel SmootTufts University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Matthew A KlugeTufts University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Daniel F SchmidtDepartment of Plastics Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 01854, USA; Department of Materials Research & Technology, Luxembourg Institute of Science & Technology, L-4940, Hautcharage, Luxembourg.
Christopher R PaetschTufts University, Department of Civil Engineering, 200 College Avenue, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Peter S KimDivisions of Plastic Surgery and Otolaryngology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. Electronic address: peter_kim@atriushealth.org.
David L KaplanTufts University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA, 02155, USA. Electronic address: david.kaplan@tufts.edu.
Tufts University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell · US

Funding

Translational Bioreactors - Engineering Complex TissuesP41EB002520 · NIBIB · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2004 to 2018
$16.7M
Tissue Engineering Resource Center: TTDP41EB027062 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic · 2019 to 2026
$12.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002520NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a large unmet need for off-the-shelf biomaterial options to supplant venous autografts in bypass and reconstructive surgical procedures. Existing graft alternatives formed from non-degradable synthetic polymers are not capable of maintaining long-term patency and are thus not indicated for <6 mm inner diameter bypass procedures. To fill this void, degradable silk-based biomaterials have been proposed that can maintain their mechanical properties (i.e. compliance) while facilitating slow but progressive biomaterial remodeling and host integration mediated by cellular colonization. The goal of the present study was to enhance the porosity of gel-spun silk tubes, to facilitate faster degradation rates and improve cellularity, and thus improve host integration over time in vivo, while maintaining requisite mechanical functions. Silk solutions with a range of molecular weight distributions and, in turn, viscosities were used to generate tubes of varying porosities. A decrease in solution concentration correlated with an increase in mean pore size and overall porosity through a density-dependent mechanism. Tubes were mechanically analyzed, and these properties were the basis of an analytical model used to correlate tube formulations to structural compliance, which were shown to be similar to the saphenous vein. Tubes were also tested for suture retention to ensure surgical utility despite increased porosity. Tubes were implanted in the abdominal aorta of Sprague-Dawley rats via an end-to-end anastomosis model. Tubes with higher porosities showed early improvements in cell colonization that progressively increased over time; conversely, the dense architecture of less porous grafts (20MB) inhibited cell ingrowth and resulted in minimal biomaterial degradation at the 6-month time point. None of the highly porous tubes (5 MB and 10MB) remained patent at 6 months, likely due remodeling inducing bulk mechanical failure or a compromised blood-material interface.

Indexed as

BioprosthesisVascular GraftingAnimalsBlood Vessel ProsthesisRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySilkSilkMechanical propertiesPorositySilkVascular grafts

Identifiers

PMID31761485
PMCPMC6942127
OpenAlexW2981979230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.