Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31761091›Full record

ArticleJournal of aging studies2019

Beyond the evaluative lens: Contextual unpredictabilities of care.

Aaron T Seaman, Jessica C Robbins, Elana D Buch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of aging studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aaron T SeamanDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. Electronic address: aaron-seaman@uiowa.edu.
Jessica C RobbinsInstitute of Gerontology and Department of Anthropology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Elana D BuchDepartment of Anthropology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Funding

SOCIAL RESEARCH TRAINING ON APPLIED ISSUES OF AGINGT32AG000117 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DUNKLE, RUTH E · 1985 to 2011
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social science and gerontological research on care tends to focus on identifying practices that qualify as "good care" and promoting interventions that might produce it. In this article, we identify this approach to care as the "evaluative lens." We argue that while useful, an evaluative approach to studying care can limit scholars' abilities to attend to the complex and disorderly aspects of care in daily life. Drawing on long-term ethnographic research in three distinct contexts of elder care, we show the central role that contextual unpredictability plays in care experiences. In so doing, we argue for scholarship that recognizes care as a form of becoming, embedded in processual and historically contigent relations.

Indexed as

Self-Help GroupsUncertaintyAgedAgingAnthropology, CulturalHumansPatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchCareDisorderEthnographyEvaluationEveryday lifeUnpredictability

Identifiers

PMID31761091
PMCPMC6880794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.