Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31760953›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2019

Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers.

Ian D Graham, Chris McCutcheon, Anita Kothari

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Beyond the horizon: new directions in research coproduction.Health research policy and systems · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Co-Design of a Weekly Meal Box for Neurological Conditions: Findings From Consumer and Healthcare Provider Collaborative Workshops.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Involving Knowledge Users in Health Services Research: Collective Reflections and Learning From a National Evaluation of Recurrent Miscarriage Services.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ian D GrahamUniversity of Ottawa, Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada. igraham@ohri.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3669-1216
Chris McCutcheonOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Anita KothariWestern University, School of Health Studies, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 143237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research co-production is about doing research with those who use it. This approach to research has been receiving increasing attention from research funders, academic institutions, researchers and even the public as a means of optimising the relevance, usefulness, usability and use of research findings, which together, the argument goes, produces greater and more timely impact. The papers in this cross BMC journal collection raise issues about research co-production that, to date, have not been fully considered and suggest areas for future research for advancing the science and practice of research co-production. These papers address some gaps in the literature, make connections between subfields and provide varied perspectives from researchers and knowledge users.

Indexed as

Concept FormationCooperative BehaviorTranslational Research, BiomedicalCommunity-Based Participatory Researchcollaborative researchengaged scholarshipIntegrated knowledge translationparticipatory researchresearch co-production

Identifiers

PMID31760953
PMCPMC6876079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.