Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31760588›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2020

Postoperative discomfort and pain in the management of hemorrhoidal disease: laser hemorrhoidoplasty, a minimal invasive treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids.

Luigi Brusciano, Claudio Gambardella, Gianmattia Terracciano, Giorgia Gualtieri, Michele Schiano di Visconte, Salvatore Tolone, Gianmattia Del Genio, Ludovico Docimo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luigi BruscianoUniversity of Study of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", via Luigi Pansini n° 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4112-1282
Claudio GambardellaUniversity of Study of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", via Luigi Pansini n° 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Gianmattia TerraccianoUniversity of Study of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", via Luigi Pansini n° 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Giorgia GualtieriUniversity of Study of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", via Luigi Pansini n° 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Michele Schiano di Visconte"S. Maria dei Battuti" Hospital, Conegliano, Conegliano, TV, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1137-4628
Salvatore ToloneUniversity of Study of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", via Luigi Pansini n° 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Gianmattia Del GenioUniversity of Study of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", via Luigi Pansini n° 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Ludovico DocimoUniversity of Study of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", via Luigi Pansini n° 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. luigi.brusciano@unicampania.it.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITOspedale di Santa Maria dei Battuti · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) treatment still remains controversial. In fact, despite many surgical progresses, postoperative pain, and discomfort remain the major weaknesses. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is a minimal invasive procedure for HD treatment determining the shrinkage of the hemorrhoidal piles by diode laser. The aim of the current study is to analyze the feasibility and efficacy of LHP in patients with II-III degrees hemorrhoids. Consecutive patients with II-III degree hemorrhoids were enrolled in the study and underwent an LHP treatment using a 1470-nm diode laser. Operative time, postoperative pain and complications, resolution of symptoms, and length of return to daily activity were prospectively evaluated. Recurrence of prolapsed hemorrhoid or symptoms at a minimum follow-up of 6 months was evaluated. Fifty patients (28 males and 22 females) were enrolled in the study. No significant intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative pain score (at 12, 18, and 24 h postoperatively), evaluated through visual analogue scale, was extremely low (mean value 2). No postoperative spontaneous bleeding occurred. The 100% of our population came back to daily activity 2 days after surgery. At a mean follow-up period of 8.6 months, we reported a recurrence rate of 0%. LHP demonstrated a large efficacy in selected patients. The greatest strength points were low postoperative pain, the presence of slightly significant peri-anal wounds, no special anal hygienic measures and low surgical time. Thus, resulting in a negligible postoperative discomfort, LHP could be considered a painless and minimal invasive technique in the treatment of HD.

Indexed as

AdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHemorrhageHemorrhoidectomyHemorrhoidsHumansLaser TherapyMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainTreatment OutcomeHemorrhoidal diseaseLaser hemorrhoidoplastyPostoperative discomfortPostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID31760588
OpenAlexW2991434056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.