Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31760573›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2019

Mutation-Driven Therapy in MDS.

David M Swoboda, David A Sallman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David M SwobodaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive FOB 3rd Floor, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
David A SallmanDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive FOB 3rd Floor, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. David.Sallman@moffitt.org.
Moffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewGenetic sequencing in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) has provided an improved understanding of the complexity and heterozygosity of the disease. More importantly, our molecular understanding of MDS is leading to rapid advancements and personalized therapy for our patients. Herein, we review the current mutation-driven treatment landscape in MDS, first focusing on individual mutations. We then discuss the effect of specific gene mutations on response and outcomes to standard therapies as well as to cutting edge investigational therapies. RECENT

findingsMolecular annotation of MDS can predict response rates and outcomes to our current standard of care therapies including hypomethylating agents, lenalidomide, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Clinical trials targeting molecular subsets of MDS are underway with some in very early stages while others advancing to phase III trials. Targeting TP53 and IDH1/2 mutations appear to be promising targets with substantial efficacy seen in several trials to date. Furthermore, novel therapeutic strategies such as immuno-oncology agents are of significant interest with future investigation required to understand the molecular predictors of response. Mutation-driven therapy in MDS is rapidly expanding and has tremendous potential in a disease where limited standard therapy options exist.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseMolecular Targeted TherapyMutationBiomarkersClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression RegulationHumansMyelodysplastic SyndromesSignal TransductionTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersEpigenetic regulatorsGenetic mutationsMyelodysplastic syndromeSplicing factorsTargeted therapyTP53

Identifiers

PMID31760573
OpenAlexW2994685426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.