Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31760193›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2020

Automatic kidney segmentation in ultrasound images using subsequent boundary distance regression and pixelwise classification networks.

Shi Yin, Qinmu Peng, Hongming Li, Zhengqiang Zhang, Xinge You, Katherine Fischer, Susan L Furth, Gregory E Tasian, Yong Fan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Neural Network for Segmenting Tumours in Ultrasound Rectal Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Clinical, Safety, and Engineering Perspectives on Wearable Ultrasound Technology: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shi YinSchool of Electronic Information and Communications, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States.
Qinmu PengSchool of Electronic Information and Communications, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Shenzhen Huazhong University of Science and Technology Research Institute, China. Electronic address: pengqinmu@hust.edu.cn.
Hongming LiDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States.
Zhengqiang ZhangSchool of Electronic Information and Communications, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xinge YouSchool of Electronic Information and Communications, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Shenzhen Huazhong University of Science and Technology Research Institute, China.
Katherine FischerDepartment of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Susan L FurthDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Gregory E TasianDepartment of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States.
Yong FanDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States. Electronic address: yong.fan@ieee.org.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Phenotypic Diversity in COVID-19UL1TR001878 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2016 to 2025
$102.4M
Research Project Core 2P50DK114786 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Razzaghi Hanieh · 2017 to 2026
$9.6M
Biomedical Image Computing and Informatics ClusterS10OD023495 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2017
$1.9M
Anatomic biomarkers of chronic kidney disease progression among childrenR21DK117297 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FAN, YONG, TASIAN, GREGORY EDWARD · 2019 to 2020
$469k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001878NIDDK NIH HHS P50 DK114786NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK117297NIH HHS S10 OD023495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It remains challenging to automatically segment kidneys in clinical ultrasound (US) images due to the kidneys' varied shapes and image intensity distributions, although semi-automatic methods have achieved promising performance. In this study, we propose subsequent boundary distance regression and pixel classification networks to segment the kidneys automatically. Particularly, we first use deep neural networks pre-trained for classification of natural images to extract high-level image features from US images. These features are used as input to learn kidney boundary distance maps using a boundary distance regression network and the predicted boundary distance maps are classified as kidney pixels or non-kidney pixels using a pixelwise classification network in an end-to-end learning fashion. We also adopted a data-augmentation method based on kidney shape registration to generate enriched training data from a small number of US images with manually segmented kidney labels. Experimental results have demonstrated that our method could automatically segment the kidney with promising performance, significantly better than deep learning-based pixel classification networks.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerPattern Recognition, AutomatedAged, 80 and overDatasets as TopicDeep LearningFemaleHumansKidney DiseasesMaleUltrasonographyBoundary detectionBoundary distance regressionPixelwise classificationUltrasound images

Identifiers

PMID31760193
PMCPMC6980346
OpenAlexW2985868371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.