Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31759823›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2020

A Conserved Noncoding Locus Regulates Random Monoallelic Xist Expression across a Topological Boundary.

Rafael Galupa, Elphège Pierre Nora, Rebecca Worsley-Hunt, Christel Picard, Chris Gard, Joke Gerarda van Bemmel, Nicolas Servant, Yinxiu Zhan, Fatima El Marjou, Colin Johanneau and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Remodeling ofScience advances · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome research · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Compensation of gene dosage on the mammalian X.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Rafael GalupaMammalian Developmental Epigenetics Group, Genetics and Developmental Biology Unit, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR3215, INSERM U934, Paris, France.
Elphège Pierre NoraMammalian Developmental Epigenetics Group, Genetics and Developmental Biology Unit, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR3215, INSERM U934, Paris, France.
Rebecca Worsley-HuntBerlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.
Christel PicardMammalian Developmental Epigenetics Group, Genetics and Developmental Biology Unit, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR3215, INSERM U934, Paris, France.
Chris GardMammalian Developmental Epigenetics Group, Genetics and Developmental Biology Unit, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR3215, INSERM U934, Paris, France.
Joke Gerarda van BemmelMammalian Developmental Epigenetics Group, Genetics and Developmental Biology Unit, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR3215, INSERM U934, Paris, France.
Nicolas ServantBioinformatics, Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Computational Systems Unit, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, INSERM U900, Paris, France; MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Paris, France.
Yinxiu ZhanFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Fatima El MarjouTransgenesis Facility, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Colin JohanneauTransgenesis Facility, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Patricia DiabangouayaMammalian Developmental Epigenetics Group, Genetics and Developmental Biology Unit, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR3215, INSERM U934, Paris, France.
Agnès Le SauxMammalian Developmental Epigenetics Group, Genetics and Developmental Biology Unit, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR3215, INSERM U934, Paris, France.
Sonia LameirasInstitut Curie Genomics of Excellence (ICGex) Platform, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Juliana Pipoli da FonsecaInstitut Curie Genomics of Excellence (ICGex) Platform, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Friedemann LoosDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Joost GribnauDepartment of Developmental Biology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Sylvain BaulandeInstitut Curie Genomics of Excellence (ICGex) Platform, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Uwe OhlerBerlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany; Department of Biology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
Luca GiorgettiFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Edith HeardMammalian Developmental Epigenetics Group, Genetics and Developmental Biology Unit, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR3215, INSERM U934, Paris, France; Collège de France, Paris, France. Electronic address: edith.heard@embl.org.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Curie · FRErasmus MC · NLMax Delbrück Center · DETransgene (France) · FRFriedrich Miescher Institute · CHInserm · FRUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

cis-Regulatory communication is crucial in mammalian development and is thought to be restricted by the spatial partitioning of the genome in topologically associating domains (TADs). Here, we discovered that the Xist locus is regulated by sequences in the neighboring TAD. In particular, the promoter of the noncoding RNA Linx (LinxP) acts as a long-range silencer and influences the choice of X chromosome to be inactivated. This is independent of Linx transcription and independent of any effect on Tsix, the antisense regulator of Xist that shares the same TAD as Linx. Unlike Tsix, LinxP is well conserved across mammals, suggesting an ancestral mechanism for random monoallelic Xist regulation. When introduced in the same TAD as Xist, LinxP switches from a silencer to an enhancer. Our study uncovers an unsuspected regulatory axis for X chromosome inactivation and a class of cis-regulatory effects that may exploit TAD partitioning to modulate developmental decisions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineConserved SequenceEnhancer Elements, GeneticMicePromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, AntisenseRNA, Long NoncodingSilencer Elements, TranscriptionalTranscription, GeneticX ChromosomeRNA, AntisenseRNA, Long Noncoding5Ccis-regulatory landscapeenhancergene regulationLinxnoncoding RNAsilencerTADsX-inactivationXist

Identifiers

PMID31759823
PMCPMC6964159
OpenAlexW2991463114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.