Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31759805›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of preventive medicine2020

Text Message Interventions for Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Diana M Smith, Laura Duque, Jeff C Huffman, Brian C Healy, Christopher M Celano

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of preventive medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07119658 (Targeting Metabolic Syndrome From the Emergency Department Through Mixed-Methods), which is not on this map. Cited by 87 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07119658 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Targeting Metabolic Syndrome From the Emergency Department Through Mixed-Methods: Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsHypertension, Hyperglycemia, Dyslipidemia, Metabolic SyndromeArmsComposite intervention to address MetS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. StandUPTV: a full-factorial optimization trial to reduce sedentary screen time among adults.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diana M SmithDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Laura DuqueDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeff C HuffmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brian C HealyHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christopher M CelanoDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: ccelano@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

Pragmatic collaborative care for cardiac inpatients with depression or anxietyR01HL133149 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HUFFMAN, JEFF C · 2017 to 2021
$3.8M
Developing a positive psychology intervention to improve cardiac health behaviorsR01HL113272 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HUFFMAN, JEFF C · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
A positive psychology intervention to promote health behaviors in heart failureK23HL123607 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CELANO, CHRISTOPHER M · 2015 to 2019
$859k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL123607NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113272NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextDespite clear health benefits, many individuals fail to achieve the recommended levels of physical activity. Text message interventions to promote physical activity hold promise owing to the ubiquity of cell phones and the low expense of text message delivery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to examine the impact of text message interventions on physical activity. Searches of PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to December 2017 were performed to identify studies investigating one-way text message interventionss to promote physical activity. A subset of RCTs, including an objective (accelerometer-based) physical activity outcome, were included in random-effects meta-analyses in 2018. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The systematic search revealed 944 articles. Of these, 59 were included in the systematic review (12 1-arm trials and 47 controlled trials; n=8,742; mean age, 42.2 years; 56.2% female). In meta-analyses of 13 studies (n=1,346), text message interventionss led to significantly greater objectively measured postintervention steps/day (Cohen's d=0.38, 95% CI=0.19, 0.58, n=10 studies). Analysis of postintervention moderate-to-vigorous physical activity found a similar but not statistically significant effect (Cohen's d=0.31, 95% CI= -0.01, 0.63, n=5 studies). Interventions with more components, tailored content, and interventions in medical populations led to nonsignificantly larger effect sizes compared with text message interventions without these features.

conclusionsText message interventions lead to higher objectively measured postintervention physical activity compared with control groups. More extensive, well-controlled studies are needed to examine this relationship further and identify characteristics of effective text message interventions.

Indexed as

Health PromotionText MessagingCell PhoneExerciseHumans

Identifiers

PMID31759805
PMCPMC6956854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.