ArticleJMIR cardio2018
Enhancing User Experience Through User Study: Design of an mHealth Tool for Self-Management and Care Engagement of Cardiovascular Disease Patients.
Article in JMIR cardio, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Actual use, intention to use, and user attitudes toward mobile health applications for coronary heart disease self-management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Meaningful patient and public involvement in digital health innovation, implementation and evaluation: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Pooled it
- Human-Centered Design of Mobile Health Apps for Older Adults: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Pooled it
- Barriers to and Facilitators of Technology in Cardiac Rehabilitation and Self-Management: Systematic Qualitative Grounded Theory Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Putting FUN into involvement: feedback user needs in the design of a mobile phone app for people with long-term conditions.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Review and Comparative Evaluation of Mobile Apps for Cardiovascular Risk Estimation: Usability Evaluation Using mHealth App Usability Questionnaire.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Review
- Exploring user experience: A qualitative analysis of the use of a physical activity support app for people with heart failure.PloS one · 2025Article
- Personal Goals, User Engagement, and Meal Adherence within a Personalised AI-Based Mobile Application for Nutrition and Physical Activity.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- An mHealth Application in German Health Care System: Importance of User Participation in the Development Process.Journal of medical systems · 2024Article
- A systematic review of the effectiveness of patient education through patient portals.JAMIA open · 2023Review
- Article
- Lessons and Reflections From an Extended Co-design Process Developing an mHealth App With and for Older Adults: Multiphase, Mixed Methods Study.JMIR aging · 2022Article
- mHealth Apps for Self-Management of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Management of cardiovascular disease using an mHealth tool: a randomized clinical trial.NPJ digital medicine · 2021Article
- An Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Mobile App for Data Collection in Type A Hemophilia: Design and Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Toward the Value Sensitive Design of eHealth Technologies to Support Self-management of Cardiovascular Diseases: Content Analysis.JMIR cardio · 2021Article
- Atrial fibrillation self-management: a mobile telephone app scoping review and content analysis.European journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2021Article
- Supporting Self-Management of Cardiovascular Diseases Through Remote Monitoring Technologies: Metaethnography Review of Frameworks, Models, and Theories Used in Research and Development.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Review
- Proposal for the User-Centered Design Approach for Health Apps Based on Successful Experiences: Integrative Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Review
- A Smart and Multifaceted Mobile Health System for Delivering Evidence-Based Secondary Prevention of Stroke in Rural China: Design, Development, and Feasibility Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs patient communication, engagement, personal health data tracking, and up-to-date information became more efficient through mobile health (mHealth), cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and other diseases that require behavioral improvements in daily life are now capable of being managed and prevented more effectively. However, to increase patient engagement through mHealth, it is important for the initial design to consider functionality and usability factors and accurately assess user demands during the developmental process so that the app can be used continuously.
objectiveThe purpose of the study was to provide insightful information for developing mHealth service for patients with CVD based on user research to help enhance communication between patients and doctors.
methodsTo drive the mobile functions and services needed to manage diseases in CVD patients, user research was conducted on patients and doctors at a tertiary general university hospital located in the Seoul metropolitan area of South Korea. Interviews and a survey were performed on patients (35 participants) and a focus group interview was conducted with doctors (5 participants). A mock-up mobile app was developed based on the user survey results, and a usability test was then conducted (8 participants) to identify factors that should be considered to improve usability.
resultsThe majority of patients showed a positive response in terms of their interest or intent to use an app for managing CVD. Functional features, such as communication with doctors, self-risk assessment, exercise, tailored education, blood pressure management, and health status recording had a score of 4.0 or higher on a 5-point Likert scale, showing that these functions were perceived to be useful to patients. The results of the mock-up usability test showed that inputting and visualizing blood pressure and other health conditions was required to be easier. The doctors requested a function that offered a comprehensive view of the patient's daily health status by linking the mHealth app data with the hospital's electronic health record system.
conclusionsInsights derived from a user study for developing an mHealth tool for CVD management, such as self-assessment and a communication channel between patients and doctors, may be helpful to improve patient engagement in care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.