ArticleJMIR cardio2019
Provider- and Patient-Related Barriers to and Facilitators of Digital Health Technology Adoption for Hypertension Management: Scoping Review.
Article in JMIR cardio, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of influences on engagement with remote health interventions targeting weight management for individuals living with excess weight.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025Pooled it
- Implementation of mHealth to support cancer diagnosis in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Health workers' adoption of digital health technology in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Timing, Indicators, and Approaches to Digital Patient Experience Evaluation: Umbrella Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Influencing Factors to mHealth Uptake With Indigenous Populations: Qualitative Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Pooled it
- Digital Patient Experience: Umbrella Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Secondary prevention by structured semi-interactive stroke prevention package in INDIA (SPRINT INDIA): Findings from the process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial.European stroke journal · 2023Trial
- Implementation and use of technology-enabled blood pressure monitoring and teleconsultation in Singapore's primary care: a qualitative evaluation using the socio-technical systems approach.BMC primary care · 2023Trial
- Choice of home blood pressure monitoring device: the role of device characteristics among Alaska Native and American Indian peoples.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Trial
- The Implementation of a Primary Care-Based Integrated Mobile Health Intervention for Stroke Management in Rural China: Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation.Frontiers in public health · 2021Trial
- Health System- and Payer-Level Decision-Making Processes Influencing the Adoption and Sustainability of Patient-Facing Digital Health Tools: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Implementing UK Oncology Nursing Society-Informed Digital Symptom Triage With Episode-Based Review in Routine NHS Acute Oncology: Service Evaluation.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Healthcare consumers' acceptance and use of digital health technology in LMICs and the role of self-efficacy and facilitating conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Facilitators of and Barriers to Implementation of a Tablet-Based Digital Health Program for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care: Qualitative Pragmatic Implementation Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- From Pilot to Practice: A Sociotechnical Perspective for Sustainable Adoption of Patient Engagement Technologies.Applied clinical informatics · 2026Article
- A Framework to Decipher and Report Implementation Strategies and Pragmatic Attributes of Trial Design Domains From Pre-Implementation Studies Identified From a Systematic Review: A Methodological Study.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators of Digital Transformation in Health Care: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- Access to digital health technologies: personalized framework and global perspectives.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Scaling European Citizen Driven Transferable and Transformative Digital Health: Protocol for an Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Trial of a Digital Health Platform to Support Multimorbidity Self-Management.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe uptake of digital health technology (DHT) has been surprisingly low in clinical practice. Despite showing great promise to improve patient outcomes and disease management, there is limited information on the factors that contribute to the limited adoption of DHT, particularly for hypertension management.
objectiveThis scoping review provides a comprehensive summary of barriers to and facilitators of DHT adoption for hypertension management reported in the published literature with a focus on provider- and patient-related barriers and facilitators.
methodsThis review followed the methodological framework developed by Arskey and O'Malley. Systematic literature searches were conducted on PubMed or Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Excerpta Medica database. Articles that reported on barriers to and/or facilitators of digital health adoption for hypertension management published in English between 2008 and 2017 were eligible. Studies not reporting on barriers or facilitators to DHT adoption for management of hypertension were excluded. A total of 2299 articles were identified based on the above criteria after removing duplicates, and they were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 2165 references did not meet the inclusion criteria. After assessing 134 studies in full text, 98 studies were excluded (full texts were either unavailable or studies did not fulfill the inclusion criteria), resulting in a final set of 32 articles. In addition, 4 handpicked articles were also included in the review, making it a total of 36 studies.
resultsA total of 36 studies were selected for data extraction after abstract and full-text screening by 2 independent reviewers. All conflicts were resolved by a third reviewer. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify major themes pertaining to barriers and facilitators of DHT from both provider and patient perspectives. The key facilitators of DHT adoption by physicians that were identified include ease of integration with clinical workflow, improvement in patient outcomes, and technology usability and technical support. Technology usability and timely technical support improved self-management and patient experience, and positive impact on patient-provider communication were most frequently reported facilitators for patients. Barriers to use of DHTs reported by physicians include lack of integration with clinical workflow, lack of validation of technology, and lack of technology usability and technical support. Finally, lack of technology usability and technical support, interference with patient-provider relationship, and lack of validation of technology were the most commonly reported barriers by patients.
conclusionsFindings suggest the settings and context in which DHTs are implemented and individuals involved in implementation influence adoption. Finally, to fully realize the potential of digitally enabled hypertension management, there is a greater need to validate these technologies to provide patients and providers with reliable and accurate information on both clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.