ReviewJournal of applied microbiology2020
Preserving US microbe collections sparks future discoveries.
Review in Journal of applied microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial biobanking: safeguarding the tiny treasures for sustainable human welfare.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Investigation of the Mechanisms of Transition of Gram-Negative Bacterial Cells into Induced Anabiosis Using Computational Methods of Classical Molecular Dynamics.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- A genomic perspective on fungal diversity and evolution.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025Review
- Indigenizing fungal biotechnology for planetary health: an opinion paper.Fungal biology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- A Review of the Biotechnological Potential of Cave Fungi: A Toolbox for the Future.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Fungal biodiversity and conservation mycology in light of new technology, big data, and changing attitudes.Current biology : CB · 2021Review
- NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Collections of micro-organisms are a crucial element of life science research infrastructure but are vulnerable to loss and damage caused by natural or man-made disasters, the untimely death or retirement of personnel, or the loss of research funding. Preservation of biological collections has risen in priority due to a new appreciation for discoveries linked to preserved specimens, emerging hurdles to international collecting and decreased funding for new collecting. While many historic collections have been lost, several have been preserved, some with dramatic rescue stories. Rescued microbes have been used for discoveries in areas of health, biotechnology and basic life science. Suggestions for long-term planning for microbial stocks are listed, as well as inducements for long-term preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.