ArticlePhysiological reports2019
Response to considerations regarding Maximal Lactate Steady State determination before redefining the gold-standard.
Article in Physiological reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Training Intensity Distribution of Marathon Runners Across Performance Levels.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Critical Power and Maximal Lactate Steady State in Cycling: "Watts" the Difference?Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Review
- Is the maximal lactate steady state concept really relevant to predict endurance performance?European journal of applied physiology · 2022Article
- A critical review of critical power.European journal of applied physiology · 2022Review
- Steady-stateEuropean journal of applied physiology · 2021Article
- Anaerobic Speed/Power Reserve and Sport Performance: Scientific Basis, Current Applications and Future Directions.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Authors' Reply to Ibai García-Tabar and Esteban M. Gorostiaga: Comment on "Relative Proximity of Critical Power and Metabolic/Ventilatory Thresholds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Comment on: "Relative Proximity of Critical Power and Metabolic/Ventilatory Thresholds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- The Importance of 'Durability' in the Physiological Profiling of Endurance Athletes.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Review
- The "Anaerobic Threshold" Concept Is Not Valid in Physiology and Medicine.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2021Article
- Comment on: "Relative Proximity of Critical Power and Metabolic/Ventilatory Thresholds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We reinforce the key messages in our earlier review paper that critical power, rather than maximal lactate steady state, provides the better index for defining steady-state vs non-steady state physiological behaviour during exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.