Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31758661›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2020

Making Better Dose Decisions: Using Exposure-Response Modeling to Integrate Efficacy Outcome of Two Phase IIb Clinical Trials of Ubrogepant for Migraine Treatment.

Chi-Chung Li, Tiffini Voss, Ken Kowalski, Bei Yang, Huub Jan Kleijn, Christopher J Jones, Rolien Bosch, David Michelson, Matthew DeAngelis, Yang Xu and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chi-Chung LiMerck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Tiffini VossMerck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Ken KowalskiAnn Arbor Pharmacometrics Group (A2PG), Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Bei YangAnn Arbor Pharmacometrics Group (A2PG), Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Huub Jan KleijnCertara Strategic Consulting, Oss, The Netherlands.
Christopher J JonesMerck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Rolien BoschMerck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
David MichelsonMerck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Matthew DeAngelisMerck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Yang XuMerck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Iris XieMerck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Prajakti A KothareMerck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ubrogepant (MK-1602) is a novel, oral, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist in clinical development with positive phase III outcomes for acute treatment of migraine. This paper describes the population exposure-response (E-R) modeling and simulations, which were used to inform the phase III dose-selection rationale, based on ~ 800 participants pooled across two phase IIb randomized dose-finding clinical trials. The E-R model describes the placebo and ubrogepant treatment effects based on migraine pain end points (2-hour pain relief and 2-hour pain freedom) at various dose levels. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate various assumptions of placebo response in light of the high placebo response observed in one phase II trial. A population pharmacokinetic model describing the effect of formulations was included in the E-R simulation framework to assess potential dose implications of a formulation switch from phase II to phase III. Model-based simulations predict that a dose of 25 mg or higher is likely to achieve significantly better efficacy than placebo with desirable efficacy levels. The understanding of E-R helped support the dose selection for the phase III clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedClinical Decision-MakingClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersModels, BiologicalPain MeasurementPyridinesPyrrolesPyridinesPyrrolesubrogepant

Identifiers

PMID31758661
PMCPMC7214662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.