Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31758638›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2019

Considerations regarding Maximal Lactate Steady State determination before redefining the gold-standard.

Ibai Garcia-Tabar, Esteban M Gorostiaga

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Metabolic, V̇OPhysiological reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. A critical review of critical power.European journal of applied physiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ibai Garcia-TabarStudies, Research and Sports Medicine Center (CEIMD), Government of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8553-8154
Esteban M GorostiagaStudies, Research and Sports Medicine Center (CEIMD), Government of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have read with interest the review written by Jones et al. (2019) published in a recent volume-issue (volume 7, issue 5) of the journal. Criticisms regarding maximal lactate steady state intensity determination are to some extent correct and well-justified. There are some aspects, however, that should be further clarified and documented before redefining the gold-standard measure for the evaluation of endurance exercise capacity.

Indexed as

ExerciseLactic AcidExercise TestExercise TherapyHumansNutritional StatusLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID31758638
PMCPMC6874780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.