Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31758632›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2020

Cortical sensitivity to natural scene structure.

Daniel Kaiser, Greta Häberle, Radoslaw M Cichy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Characterizing internal models of the visual environment.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Visual Recognition Memory of Scenes Is Driven by Categorical, Not Sensory, Visual Representations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. EEG Decoding Reveals Neural Predictions for Naturalistic Material Behaviors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  11. Rapid Extraction of the Spatial Distribution of Physical Saliency and Semantic Informativeness from Natural Scenes in the Human Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Grounding Context in Embodied Cognitive Robotics.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel KaiserDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9007-3160
Greta HäberleDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Radoslaw M CichyDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4190-6071

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural scenes are inherently structured, with meaningful objects appearing in predictable locations. Human vision is tuned to this structure: When scene structure is purposefully jumbled, perception is strongly impaired. Here, we tested how such perceptual effects are reflected in neural sensitivity to scene structure. During separate fMRI and EEG experiments, participants passively viewed scenes whose spatial structure (i.e., the position of scene parts) and categorical structure (i.e., the content of scene parts) could be intact or jumbled. Using multivariate decoding, we show that spatial (but not categorical) scene structure profoundly impacts on cortical processing: Scene-selective responses in occipital and parahippocampal cortices (fMRI) and after 255 ms (EEG) accurately differentiated between spatially intact and jumbled scenes. Importantly, this differentiation was more pronounced for upright than for inverted scenes, indicating genuine sensitivity to spatial structure rather than sensitivity to low-level attributes. Our findings suggest that visual scene analysis is tightly linked to the spatial structure of our natural environments. This link between cortical processing and scene structure may be crucial for rapidly parsing naturalistic visual inputs.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingCerebral CortexElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOccipital LobeParahippocampal GyrusPhotic StimulationSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung AdultEEGfMRImultivariate decodingscene representationspatial structurevisual perception

Identifiers

PMID31758632
PMCPMC7267931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.