Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31758518›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2020

The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health.

Angelique de Rijk, Ziv Amir, Miri Cohen, Tomislav Furlan, Lode Godderis, Bojana Knezevic, Massimo Miglioretti, Fehmidah Munir, Adela Elena Popa, Maria Sedlakova and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06994182 (Perspectives of Italian Employers Regarding the Return to Work Process of Employees Who Received a Cancer Diagnosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06994182 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Perspectives of Italian Employers Regarding the Return to Work Process of Employees Who Received a Cancer Diagnosis: a Qualitative Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAzienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCSRan2025 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsCancer Survivors
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recovering or working: women's experiences of working while coping with cancer: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Angelique de RijkDepartment of Social Medicine, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Angelique.derijk@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5828-0629
Ziv AmirSchool of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
Miri CohenSchool of Social Work, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Tomislav FurlanAdria Medic Occupational Health Clinic, Pazin, Croatia.
Lode GodderisDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Environment and Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bojana KnezevicDepartment of Quality Improvement in Health Care, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Massimo MigliorettiDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Fehmidah MunirSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK.
Adela Elena PopaFaculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania.
Maria SedlakovaCentral European Labour Studies Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Steffen TorpDepartment of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, University College of South-Eastern Norway, Notodden, Norway.
Dana YagilDepartment of Human Services, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Sietske TammingaCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Angela de BoerCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study explored employer's perspectives on (1) their experience of good practice related to workers diagnosed with cancer and their return to work (RTW), and (2) their perceived needs necessary to achieve good practice as reported by employers from nine separate countries.

methodsTwenty-five semi-structured interviews were held in eight European countries and Israel with two to three employers typically including HR managers or line managers from both profit and non-profit organisations of different sizes and sectors. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A grounded theory/thematic analysis approach was completed.

resultsEmployers' experience with RTW assistance for workers with cancer appears to be a dynamic process. Results indicate that good practice includes six phases: (1) reacting to disclosure, (2) collecting information, (3) decision-making related to initial actions, (4) remaining in touch, (5) decision-making on RTW, and (6) follow-up. The exact details of the process are shaped by country, employer type, and worker characteristics; however, there was consistency related to the need for (1) structured procedures, (2) collaboration, (3) communication skills training, (4) information on cancer, and (5) financial resources for realizing RTW support measures.

conclusionsNotwithstanding variations at country, employer, and worker levels, the employers from all nine countries reported that good practice regarding RTW assistance in workers with a history of cancer consists of the six phases above. Employers indicate that they would benefit from shared collaboration and resources that support good practice for this human resource matter. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Further research and development based on the six phases of employer support as a framework for a tool or strategy to support workers with a history of cancer across countries and organisations is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPublic PolicyReturn to WorkWorkplaceCancerCross-country variationsEmployerQualitativeReturn-to-work

Identifiers

PMID31758518
PMCPMC7182537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.