Trial reportMolecular imaging and biology2020
SUV
Trial report in Molecular imaging and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of quantitative imaging analysis methods to evaluate murine [18F]FLT PET therapy response studies.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Dependence of Renal Uptake on Kidney Function in [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Quantitative Evaluation of a Multimodal Aptamer-Targeted Long-Circulating Polymer for Tumor Targeting.ACS omega · 2023Article
- Image intensity histograms as imaging biomarkers: application to immune-related colitis.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2021Article
- A [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT Radiomic Model for Non-Invasive Prediction of Tumour Grade in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Exploratory Analysis ofFrontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWidely used in clinical practice, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV PROCEDURES: To this aim, our previously published work, proving the efficacy of mannitol, was considered as a background study. Renal SUV
resultsSUV
conclusionsOur findings indicate that SUV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.