ArticleInternational ophthalmology2020
Effects of vitamin D deficiency on intraocular pressure values obtained by ocular response analyzer.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitamin D and Ocular Diseases: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Treatment of Glaucoma with Natural Products and Their Mechanism of Action: An Update.Nutrients · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare corneal biomechanical properties measured with ocular response analyzer (ORA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements in patients with vitamin D deficiency and in healthy cases.
methodsOne hundred and twenty eyes of 120 subjects (between the ages of 19 and 78) who applied to university's outpatient clinic were evaluated: 41 lacks of vitamin D (Group 1), 39 insufficient vitamin D (Group 2) and 40 controls (Group 3). Corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, Goldmann-correlated IOP and corneal compensated IOP of patients were measured by ORA.
resultsThe mean ages were 48.9 ± 12.1, 52.8 ± 13.6 and 52.1 ± 13.9 in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.370). Mean IOPcc values were 16.5 ± 3.6 (8.1-27.3), 16.7 ± 2.7 (12.0-22.7) and 16.3 ± 3.3 (10.8-27.4) mmHg (p = 0.889); mean IOPg values were 16.8 ± 5.0 (6.5-39.5), 16.3 ± 2.9 (10.3-23.0) and 15.9 ± 3.2 (10.0-26.0) mmHg (p = 0.539); mean CH values were 10.8 ± 1.9 (8.3-19.0), 11.4 ± 1.6 (6.9-14.0) and 11.2 ± 1.5 (7.5-13.2) (p = 0.257); mean CRF values were 10.5 ± 2.7 (7.4-25.0), 11.1 ± 1.5 (6.8-13.5) and 10.5 ± 1.2 (7.7-12.8) (p = 0.282) in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of IOPcc, IOPg CH and CRF. However, mean CH values were found less in the lack of vitamin D group.
conclusionThe CH values were lower, and the IOPg values were higher in cases of vitamin D deficiency. Corneal biomechanical differences in patients with lack of vitamin D were not statistically significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.