Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31758468›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2020

Pretreatment Esophageal Wall Thickness Associated with Response to Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

Kraipop Wongwaiyut, Sakchai Ruangsin, Supparerk Laohawiriyakamol, Siriporn Leelakiatpaiboon, Duangjai Sangthawan, Patrapim Sunpaweravong, Somkiat Sunpaweravong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kraipop WongwaiyutDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, 90110, Thailand.
Sakchai RuangsinDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, 90110, Thailand.
Supparerk LaohawiriyakamolDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, 90110, Thailand.
Siriporn LeelakiatpaiboonDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, 90110, Thailand.
Duangjai SangthawanDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, 90110, Thailand.
Patrapim SunpaweravongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, 90110, Thailand.
Somkiat SunpaweravongDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, 90110, Thailand. susomkia@medicine.psu.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1387-532X

Funding

Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University 58-265-10-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA multimodality approach using concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by esophagectomy has been the standard treatment in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Computed tomography (CT) is widely utilized to evaluate esophageal cancer before and after CRT. This study evaluated the utility of pretreatment maximal esophageal wall thickness on CT scans to predict treatment outcomes after CRT in patients with locally advanced ESCC.

methodsEighty-one patients with T3 locally advanced ESCC, whom were treated completely with CRT with and without surgery, and had available CT scans before and after CRT at a university hospital between 2005 and 2015, were retrospectively reviewed.

resultTwenty patients (24.7%) had esophagectomy after neoadjuvant CRT and sixty-one patients (75.3%) had definitive CRT. The maximal esophageal wall thicknesses were measured retrospectively and correlated with the response and survival after treatment. A total of 40% of neoadjuvant CRT patients achieved a pCR. There was a significant difference in pretreatment maximal esophageal wall thickness between the pCR and non-pCR groups (mean 11.9 ± 5.3 mm versus 16.9 ± 3 mm; p = 0.01). Pretreatment maximal esophageal wall thickness < 10 mm was significantly related to better overall survival than ≥ 10 mm (median survival 79 months versus 15 months; HR 3.21, 95%CI 1.14-9; p = 0.02). The neoadjuvant CRT group had significantly better survival than the definitive CRT group (median survival 51 months versus 14.5 months; HR 0.46; 95%CI 0.25-0.85; p = 0.01).

conclusionIn our study, pretreatment esophageal wall thickness of T3 locally advanced ESCC is a useful indicator for predicting survival and pCR after treatment.

Indexed as

AgedChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaEsophagectomyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateChemoradiotherapyComputed tomography (CT)Esophageal cancerEsophagectomyWall thickness

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.