Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31758438›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2020

Assessment of VITEK® MS IVD database V3.0 for identification of Nocardia spp. using two culture media and comparing direct smear and protein extraction procedures.

T Durand, F Vautrin, E Bergeron, V Girard, S Polsinelli, V Monnin, G Durand, O Dauwalder, O Dumitrescu, F Laurent and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Open forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Rapid, Easy, and Reliable Identification ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Updated Review onClinical microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  10. A Canine Case ofVeterinary sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

T DurandInstitut des Agents infectieux, Centre de Biologie et Pathologies Nord, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France.
F VautrinUMR CNRS 5557, Ecologie Microbienne - Groupe de Recherche "Pathogènes Opportunistes et Environnement" - ISPB-Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
E BergeronUMR CNRS 5557, Ecologie Microbienne - Groupe de Recherche "Pathogènes Opportunistes et Environnement" - ISPB-Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
V GirardbioMérieux France, Microbiology R&D, La Balme-les-Grottes, France.
S PolsinellibioMérieux France, Microbiology R&D, La Balme-les-Grottes, France.
V MonninbioMérieux France, Microbiology R&D, La Balme-les-Grottes, France.
G DurandbioMérieux France, Microbiology R&D, La Balme-les-Grottes, France.
O DauwalderInstitut des Agents infectieux, Centre de Biologie et Pathologies Nord, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France.
O DumitrescuInstitut des Agents infectieux, Centre de Biologie et Pathologies Nord, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France.
F LaurentInstitut des Agents infectieux, Centre de Biologie et Pathologies Nord, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France.
V Rodríguez-NavaInstitut des Agents infectieux, Centre de Biologie et Pathologies Nord, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France. veronica.rodriguez-nava@univ-lyon1.fr.
bioMérieux (France) · FRHôpital de la Croix-Rousse · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed the performance of the VITEK® MS IVD V3.0 matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization - time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS) V3.0 database for the identification of Nocardia spp. as compared with targeted DNA sequencing. A collection of 222 DNA sequence-defined Nocardia spp. strains encompassing 18 different species present or not in the database was tested. Bromocresol purple agar (BCP) and Columbia agar +5% sheep's blood (COS) culture media were used together with two different preparation steps: direct smear and a "3 attempts" procedure that covered (1) spotting of an extract, (2) new spotting of the same extract, and (3) spotting of a new extract. The direct smear protocol yielded low correct identification rates (≤ 15% for both media) whereas protein extraction yielded correct identification results (> 67% regardless of the media used.). The use of 2 additional attempts using repeat or new extracts increased correct identification rates to 87% and 91% for BCP and COS, respectively. When using the 3 attempts procedure, the best identification results, independent of media types, were obtained for N. farcinica and N. cyriacigeorgica (100%). Identification attempts 2 and 3 allowed to increase the number of correct identifications (BCP, +20%; COS, +13%). The enhancement in performance during attempts 2 and 3 was remarkable for N. abscessus (81% for both media) and low prevalence species (BCP, 70%; COS, 85%). Up to 3.4% and 2.4% of the strains belonging to species present in the database were misidentified with BCP and COS media, respectively. In 1.9% of the cases for BCP and 1.4% for COS, these misidentifications concerned a species belonging to the same phylogenetic complex. Concerning strains that are not claimed in the V3.0 database, N. puris and N. goodfellowi generated "No identification" results and 100% of the strains belonging to N. arthritidis, N.cerradoensis, and N. altamirensis yielded a misidentification within the same phylogenetic complex. Vitek® MS IVD V3.0 is an accurate and useful tool for identification of Nocardia spp.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesDatabases, FactualAlgorithmsBacterial ProteinsHumansNocardiaNocardia InfectionsReagent Kits, DiagnosticReproducibility of ResultsWorkflowBacterial ProteinsReagent Kits, DiagnosticBCPCOSDNA sequencingMALDI-ToFNocardia spp.

Identifiers

PMID31758438
OpenAlexW2991288585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.