Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31758411›Full record

ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2020

Fabrication and Evaluation of a Xenogeneic Decellularized Nerve-Derived Material: Preclinical Studies of a New Strategy for Nerve Repair.

Ting Li, Zhigang Sui, Akira Matsuno, Hirotomo Ten, Kenichi Oyama, Akihiro Ito, Hong Jiang, Xiaomin Ren, Rabia Javed, Lihua Zhang and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Management of accidental tooth root displacement into the mandibular canal during tooth extraction].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The 2020 Yearbook of Neurorestoratology.Journal of neurorestoratology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ting LiDepartment of Tissue Engineering, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Zhigang SuiKey Laboratory of Separation Science for Analytical Chemistry, National Chromatographic Research and Analysis Center, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, China.
Akira MatsunoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirotomo TenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenichi OyamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiro ItoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hong JiangShandong Junxiu Biotechnology Company, Limited, Yantai, China.
Xiaomin RenShandong Junxiu Biotechnology Company, Limited, Yantai, China.
Rabia JavedDepartment of Tissue Engineering, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Lihua ZhangKey Laboratory of Separation Science for Analytical Chemistry, National Chromatographic Research and Analysis Center, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, China. lihuazhang@dicp.ac.cn.
Qiang AoDepartment of Tissue Engineering, China Medical University, Shenyang, China. aoqiang@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1309-1971
Teikyo University · JPChina Medical University · CNDalian Institute of Chemical Physics · CNSichuan University · CNTeikyo Heisei University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The repair and regeneration of transected peripheral nerves is an important area of clinical research, and the adhesion of anastomosis sites to surrounding tissues is a vital factor affecting the quality of nerve recovery after nerve anastomosis. This study involves the generation of a novel nerve repair membrane derived from decellularized porcine nerves using a unique, innovative technique. The decellularized nerve matrix was verified to be effective in eliminating cellular components, and it still retained some neural extracellular matrix components and bioactive molecules (collagens, glycosaminoglycans, laminin, fibronectin, TGF-β, etc.), which were mainly determined by proteomic analysis, histochemistry, immunohistochemistry, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Cytotoxicity, intracutaneous reactivity, hemolysis, and cell affinity analyses were conducted to confirm the biosecurity of the nerve repair membrane. The in vivo functionality was assessed in a rat sciatic nerve transection model, and indices of functional nerve recovery, including the measurement of the claw-spread reflex, nerve anastomosis site adhesion, electrophysiological properties, and the number of regenerated nerve fibers, were evaluated. The results indicated that the nerve repair membrane could effectively prevent adhesion between the nerve anastomosis sites and the surrounding tissues and enhance nerve regeneration, which could be attributed to its various bioactive components. In conclusion, the novel nerve repair membrane derived from xenogeneic decellularized nerves described in this study shows great potential auxiliary clinical treatment for peripheral nerve injuries.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenCulture Media, ConditionedExtracellular MatrixMalePeripheral Nerve InjuriesProteomicsRabbitsRats, Sprague-DawleySciatic NerveSwineBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenCulture Media, Conditionedanti-adhesionNerve repair membraneperipheral nerve regenerationproteomicsxenogeneic decellularized matrix

Identifiers

PMID31758411
PMCPMC7007487
OpenAlexW2990216814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.