Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31758385›Full record

Observational studyTropical animal health and production2020

Smallholder pig farming education improved community knowledge and pig management in Angónia district, Mozambique.

Abel G Chilundo, Samson Mukaratirwa, Alberto Pondja, Sónia Afonso, Zeiss Alfredo, Elisio Chato, Maria Vang Johansen

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Tropical animal health and production, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abel G ChilundoFaculty of Veterinary, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique. abegochil@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3207-5480
Samson MukaratirwaSchool of Life Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban, South Africa.
Alberto PondjaFaculty of Veterinary, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique.
Sónia AfonsoFaculty of Veterinary, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique.
Zeiss AlfredoFaculty of Veterinary, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique.
Elisio ChatoLivestock Sector, District Services of Economic Activities, Angónia, Mozambique.
Maria Vang JohansenSection for Parasitology and Aquatic Pathobiology, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlægevej 100, 1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

Funding

Danish International Development Agency file no. 09-007LIFE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Education on pig farming has been recognized as an important method of transferring knowledge and improving production among smallholder pig producers in rural settings, but the effectiveness of this in different rural settings remains unknown. A community-based intervention trial on smallholder pig farmers was conducted with the aim of evaluating the effectiveness of pig farming education. Baseline information was collected using interview-based questionnaires and observations regarding pig welfare and husbandry practices followed by participatory pig farming education and field demonstrations. The study was carried out between May 2014 and May 2016 and involved 90 smallholder pig farmers from six villages in Angónia district, of Tete province in Mozambique. The baseline questionnaire among several aspects regarding pig management highlighted that most farmers had an overall knowledge on aspects of transmission (55.1%) and prevention (48.9%) of African swine fever (ASF), porcine cysticercosis (PC) transmission (8.2%), and field diagnosis (36.7%), and they were not aware of the zoonotic potential of PC or the basic husbandry procedures of pigs kept under permanent confinement. Forty-nine of the 90 farmers enrolled, participated in the pig farming education, which provided the basis for making a comparison between trained (54%) and non-trained (46%) pig farmers. Since knowledge for ASF transmission (P < 0.036), pig pen design (P < 0.014), reasons for confine the pigs (P < 0.016), as well as the adoption of the new introduced pig pen model (P < 0.025), and the practices of acceptable, good hygiene of the pig pen (P < 0.009 and P < 0.014, respectively), improved significantly in both groups, a remarkable spill-over was observed, proving villagers capable of transferring knowledge within the villages. However, water provision and total confinement in both groups were still not practiced by the most farmers following the pig farming education (P > 0.174 and 0.254). It is concluded that despite improved knowledge, the farmers failed to follow several recommendations, most likely due to poverty such as lack of basic resources like food and water, which even the farmers themselves lacked for their day to day living.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSwineAdultAfrican Swine FeverAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCysticercosisFarmersFarmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMozambiqueRisk FactorsRural PopulationCommunity-based interventionEffectivenessImprovementKnowledgeMozambiqueObservation studyQuestionnaireTraining

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.