Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31758352›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2019

Endomyocardial Fibrosis: an Update After 70 Years.

Ana Olga Mocumbi, J Russell Stothard, Paulo Correia-de-Sá, Magdi Yacoub

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Endomyocardial fibrosis: case report].Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Overview of Restrictive Cardiomyopathies.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana Olga MocumbiDivision of Non-Communicable Diseases, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Faculdade de Medicina, Maputo, Mozambique. amocumbi@gmail.com.
J Russell StothardLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Paulo Correia-de-SáCentro de Investigação Farmacológica e Inovação Medicamentosa, Porto, Portugal.
Magdi YacoubImperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review aims at highlighting the need to better understand the pathogenesis and natural history of endomyocardial fibrosis when set against its changing endemicity and disease burden, improvements in diagnosis, and new options for clinical management. RECENT

findingsProgress in imaging diagnostic techniques and availability of new targets for drug and surgical treatment of heart failure are contributing to earlier diagnosis and may lead to improvement in patient survival. Endomyocardial fibrosis was first described in Uganda by Davies more than 70 years ago (1948). Despite its poor prognosis, the etiology of this neglected tropical restrictive cardiomyopathy still remains enigmatic nowadays. Our review reflects on the journey of scientific discovery and construction of the current guiding concepts on this mysterious and fascinating condition, bringing to light the contemporary knowledge acquired over these years. Here we describe novel tools for diagnosis, give an overview of the improvement in clinical management, and finally, suggest research themes that can help improve patient outcomes focusing (whenever possible) on novel players coming into action.

Indexed as

Endomyocardial FibrosisNeglected DiseasesCardiomyopathy, RestrictiveCost of IllnessDeveloping CountriesDisease ProgressionHeart FailureHumansPovertyEndomyocardial fibrosisInflammationNeglected cardiovascular disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.