Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31758276›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2019

Refeeding Syndrome in the Critically Ill: a Literature Review and Clinician's Guide.

C L McKnight, C Newberry, M Sarav, R Martindale, R Hurt, B Daley

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Australasian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Consensus statements on refeeding syndrome.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Refeeding syndrome in at-risk hospitalized children: A descriptive study.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

C L McKnightDepartment of Trauma/Surgical Critical Care, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, 1924 Alcoa Highway Box U-11, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA. cmcknight@utmck.edu.
C NewberryDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 1283 York Avenue, 9th Floor, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
M SaravSection of Nephrology and Hypertension, NorthShore University Health Systems, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
R MartindaleDepartment of General Surgery, Oregon Health Science University, 3303 SW Bond Ave Fl 6, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
R HurtDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
B DaleyDepartment of Trauma/Surgical Critical Care, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, 1924 Alcoa Highway Box U-11, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA.
Alcoa (United States) · USCornell University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo provide an overview of current methods of diagnosis and management of refeeding syndrome in the critically ill patient population. RECENT

findingsDespite recent publications indicating refeeding syndrome (RFS) is an ongoing problem in critically ill patients, there is no standard for the diagnosis and management of this life-threatening condition. There is not a "gold standard" nutrition assessment tool for the critically ill. Currently, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence criteria represent the best clinical assessment tool for RFS. Diagnosis and management with the help of a multidisciplinary metabolic team can decrease morbidity and mortality. Although a universal definition of RFS has yet to be defined, the diagnosis is made in patients with moderate to severe malnutrition who develop electrolyte imbalance after beginning nutritional support. The imbalances potentially can lead to cardiac, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal complications and failure. Standardizing a multidisciplinary nutrition care plan and formulating a protocol for critically ill patients who develop RFS can potentially decrease complication rates and overall mortality.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEnteral NutritionHumansNutrition AssessmentParenteral NutritionRefeeding SyndromeRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeEnteralGastrointestinalHypophosphatemiaMalnutritionParenteralRefeeding syndrome

Identifiers

PMID31758276
OpenAlexW2990684678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.