Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31758248›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2020

Fecal and urinary incontinence are major problems associated with rectal cancer.

Leif Schiffmann, Karel Kostev, Matthias Kalder

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessment of the psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of the cancer survivors' self-efficacy scale.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leif SchiffmannDepartment of General, Thoracic, Vascular, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Karel KostevEpidemiology, IQVIA, Unterschweinstiege 2-14, 60549, Frankfurt, Germany. kkostev@de.imshealth.com.
Matthias KalderDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe goal of this retrospective cohort study was to analyze the incidence of urinary incontinence (UI) and fecal incontinence (FI) within 5 years of diagnosis in patients with rectal carcinoma (RC) and within 5 years of a randomly selected visit date in non-cancer controls followed in general practices in Germany.

methodsPatients who had received an initial RC diagnosis at one of 1262 general practices in Germany between January 2008 and December 2017 were included in this study (index date). Patients without cancer were matched (1:1) to RC patients by sex, age, index year, and practice. The main outcome of the study was the incidence of UI and FI within 5 years of RC diagnosis.

resultsThe study included 3249 individuals with RC and 3249 individuals without cancer (mean age 66.5 years, 57.3% males). Within 5 years of the index date, 8.6% of RC patients and 1.3% of patients without cancer received a FI diagnosis, and 16.7% of RC patients and 5.3% of patients without cancer received a UI diagnosis. Overall, RC was positively associated with both FI (hazard ratio (HR) 8.39, 95% CI 5.50-12.81) and UI (HR 3.59, 95% CI 2.91-4.44). These findings were corroborated in the different age subgroups.

conclusionIn accordance with the literature, we confirmed that RC is significantly associated with fecal and urinary incontinence. However, it appears that the awareness of this fact needs to be improved among general practitioners since our data show lower percentages of fecal and urinary incontinence diagnoses compared with the percentages for specialized centers reported in the literature.

Indexed as

AgedFecal IncontinenceFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleRectal NeoplasmsTime FactorsUrinary IncontinenceFecal incontinenceRectal cancerUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID31758248
OpenAlexW2990861280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.