Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31758133›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2019

Timings and skill mix in primary dental care: a pilot study.

Suruchi G Ganbavale, James W Aukett, Jennifer E Gallagher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A confluence of unanimity.British dental journal · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suruchi G GanbavaleDoctoral Research Fellow, University of Portsmouth Dental Academy, William Beatty Building, Hampshire Terrace, Portsmouth PO1 2QG and Formerly, Visiting Researcher, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Portsmouth, UK. suruchiganbavale@gmail.com.
James W AukettVisiting Lecturer in Dental Public Health Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences King's College London, Denmark Hill Campus, Bessemer Road, London, UK.
Jennifer E GallagherDean for International Affairs, Head of Population and Patient Health, Newland-Pedley Professor of Oral Health Strategy, Honorary Consultant in Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences King's College London, Denmark Hill Campus, Bessemer Road, SE5 9RS, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim The aim of this pilot study was to explore the time taken to complete key contemporary dental procedures by dentists and dental hygienists/therapists (DH/DTs) working in primary dental care and their views on the factors that influence the length of time taken to complete individual dental procedures.Materials and methods An exploratory mixed methods study of linear design, involving a questionnaire survey followed by focus group discussions exploring time required to complete dental procedures and influences, was conducted using a purposive sample of dental professionals working in primary dental care within the south east of England. Descriptive analysis of absolute timings was performed, together with thematic analysis of their reported influences.Results Twenty-nine dental professionals completed the questionnaire survey, 11 of whom participated in subsequent focus group discussions to explore the initial findings. While dentists reported higher average times and a wider range for clinical examination and treatment planning, DH/DTs reported spending longer on prevention. Average timings for restorations and extractions were similar across both professional groups. Perceived influences on the length of time required to complete dental procedures were patient complexity, system of care, type of remuneration system and philosophy of care emphasising quality, together with practice environment, including the level of nursing support and surgery-location within the building; individual clinician factors relating to the type of dental professional, their interests and expertise were also identified. Whilst there was general agreement amongst respondents over the range of influencing factors, DH/DTs reported being particularly affected by the current type of remuneration system and level of support within practice.Conclusions Within the limits of a pilot study, this research suggests patterns in timings of the delivery of primary dental care procedures and identifies multiple diverse influences. Further research at national level is required to develop a deeper understanding of the time taken to deliver primary dental care and the impact of various influences to confirm the findings and inform human resource considerations in addressing population oral health needs.

Indexed as

Dental CarePrimary Health CareAttitude of Health PersonnelDentistsEnglandHumansPilot Projects

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.