ArticleScientific reports2019
Multisensory integration in virtual interactions with distant objects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in body perception following virtual object manipulation are accompanied by changes of the internal reference scale.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- On the Role of Interoception in Body and Object Perception: A Multisensory-Integration Account.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023Article
- Perceptual changes after learning of an arbitrary mapping between vision and hand movements.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- On the relevance of task instructions for the influence of action on perception.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- Action affects perception through modulation of attention.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Statistically optimal integration of multimodal signals is known to take place in direct interactions with environmental objects. In the present study we tested whether the same mechanism is responsible for perceptual biases observed in a task, in which participants enclose visual objects by manually controlled visual cursors. We manipulated the relative reliability of visual object information and measured the impact of body-related information on object perception as well as the perceptual variability. The results were qualitatively consistent with statistically optimal sensory integration. However, quantitatively, the observed bias and variability measures systematically differed from the model predictions. This outcome indicates a compensatory mechanism similar to the reliability-based weighting of multisensory signals which could underlie action's effects in visual perception reported in diverse context conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.